Documents / Report

Department of the Air Force Report, 1996

U.S. Department of War · 1996-09-10 · 181 pages · text from the file's own layer

This final report, dated September 10, 1996, was prepared by the Research Triangle Institute for the Department of the Air Force's 45th and 30th Space Wing safety offices. Titled Modeling Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, it shows how rare Mode-5 failures, in which a rocket veers well off its intended flight line, are modeled in the DAMP risk-analysis program. An appendix lists Atlas, Delta, Titan and Thor launch and failure histories through August 1996.

From the source:Release of 2026-05-08 Incident: 9/10/96, N/A. This report describes the Modeling of Unlikely Space-Booster Failures in Risk Calculations, documenting historical launch failure modes and recommending corrective actions to address them using novel modelling techniques.

  • p. 88 …Vehicle loses control at or shortly after liftoff, with all flight directions equally likely. Destruct is…
  • p. 106 …121 (8) Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis…
  • p. 111 …Such behavior did not necessarily prevent the attainment of some, or even all, mission objectives. 50…
  • p. 131 …Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon, and primary mission…
  • p. 132 …Although Atlas performance was satisfactory, the mission was apparently a failure. No other data available. 134…
  • p. 133 …A flight-control malfunction occurred at about 15 seconds at the start of the pitch program…
  • p. 137 …Vehicle became unstable when B2 pitch control was lost at 121 seconds. Loss of pitch control…
  • p. 138 …The missile then lost attitude control, executing a hard yaw rate tum throughout and beyond the…
  • p. 139 …of the rate gyro or an electrical failure in the pitch channel of the flight control…
  • p. 140 caused yaw and roll rates that the flight control system could not correct. As a result…
  • p. 151 …Attitude control lost during second stage coast period. Third stage spun up, but did not fire…
  • p. 153 …One solid-rocket motor carried to MECO, but mission was still a complete success. 102. SMS…
  • p. 169 …Missile tumbled out of control at 130 seconds, then broke up. 104. IHA (65-210), 1…
  • p. 170 …Nominal mission through transtage second burn shutdown. Attitude control system engine failed to shutdown following vernier…
  • p. 171 …However, satellite propulsion system malfunctioned putting satellite in uncontrollable position with no possibility of restoring mission…
  • p. 172 …control until propellant depletion. Trajectory inaccuracies were compensated for during Stage-2 burn, and the mission…
  • p. 180 …Missiles/Space Vehicle Files, 45th Space Wing, Wing Safety, Mission Flight Control and Analysis (SEO), 1957…
Sustainer engine shut down at 282 seconds. Missile impacted 1300 miles
downrange and 18 miles crossrange.
111. 114D (LV-3A)/Agena B (Ocean Way), 22 Dec 61, Response Mode NA, Flight
Phase 2: Flight was considered successful although a failure in· the flight
programmer prevented the SECO signal from cutting off the sustainer engine.
Sustainer burned an additional 2.5 seconds to propellant depletion producing
excess Atlas velocity.
114. 121 D (Ranger 3), 26 Jan 62, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 2 and 5: Failure of
pulse beacon in guidance system at 49 seconds caused sustainer to burn to LOX
depletion, resulting in a 300 ft/sec overspeed. Due to malfunction of pulse
beacon at 49 seconds, no guidance steering commands or discretes were given;
Booster was cut off by backup signal from accelerometer, sustainer by fuel
depletion. Due to excess speed, spacecraft passed 22,000 miles in front of moon,
and primary mission objective was not met. All other Atlas and Agena systems
performed as planned.
116. 1370 (Big John), 16 Feb 62, Response Mode NA, Flight Phase 1.5: Flight was
considered successful, although RV did not separate properly.
118. 52D (Chain Smoke), 21 Feb 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: A fire in the
engine comparhnent resulted in shutdown of all engines at 60 seconds and vehicle
explosion at 72 seconds.
119. 66E (Silver Spur), 28 Feb 62, Response Mode 4T, Flight Phase 1.5 and 2: Loss of
helium-bottle pressure resulted in failure to jettison booster engines and
premature vernier-engine cutoff at 131.5 seconds. Cutoff of verniers resulted in
loss of roll control. Vehicle exploded at 295 seconds.
122. llF, 9 Apr 62, Response Mode 1, Flight Phase 1: An explosion in thrust section at
0.9 seconds after about 6 feet of motion was followed by-a further explosion in the
propellant tanks and total missile destruction at 1.2 seconds.
123. 110D (LV-3A)/ Agena B (Night Hunt), Midas, 9 Apr 62, Response Mode NA,
Flight Phase 1: An autopilot malfunction prevented sufficient pitchover during
booster and sustainer phase resulting in improper SECO conditions and an
improper orbit.
128. 104D, 8 May 62, Response Mode 4, Flight Phase 1: Flight appeared normal until
about 45 seconds when weather shield shifted~ Further shocks occurred at 50
seconds with loss of weather shield. Booster-engine cutoff was initiated at 55
seconds. Missile destroyed itself at 57 seconds due to breakup of Centaur upper
stage. Recorded impact was 8500 feet downrange and 8200 feet crossrange.
9/10/96 122 RTI

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the pursue collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 181 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.