Documents / Document
This MoD file, titled UFOs - Persistent Correspondence - Dr David Clarke, holds Dr David Clarke's Freedom of Information requests and emails to the Directorate of Air Staff from 2005 to 2008. Clarke asked for the DI55 report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region and for Rendlesham papers. He also sought records about Nick Pope. Other items include an internal review that released redacted passages on plasmas, the MoD's statement that it had no report of the 2008 South Wales police helicopter sighting, and a 2009 disposal form.
“UAP Task Force”1 page
Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.
4. A question I feel the Press will certainly ask (see Attachment B) is how much in the way of public funds were spent on the production of this report. If precise figures have not been kept (as the report was part of a larger contract) is it possible to estimate how has been spent, based upon similar projects undertaken by MoD? It is not possible to provide details of the cost of producing the report. The author was initially employed as a contractor and commenced work on the report in December 1996. However, producing the report was only one of several tasks in which he was engaged and it is not possible to determine how much of his time was divided between producing the report and his other tasks. In addition, the author only spent 50-60% of his working week on these tasks (this time was split between working in London and working at his company's offices). The remaining percentage of his time was spent working on his company's business. The author left his company on early retirement in Section 40 following which he was employed as a consultant for the DIS until completion of the report in March 2000. 5. Who has had sight of this report in terms of senior officials and/or ministers at the Ministry of Defence? The report was not passed to any MoD Ministers. The report was distributed to only three senior officials within the MoD and Royal Air Force at Director level or above. 6. Further to my email dated 23 February, I should have mentioned one Additional question for DIS relating to the UAP report. I noted that in the three page paper dated 22 January 1997 produced by the author of the report (which you released in August last year), he refers to the UAP project as "Project Condign." Could DIS confirm that "Condign" was the word used to describe the project during the period 1997-2000. If so, is there any significance in the choice of the word? The similarity to "Condon" (the name of the USAF study, completed in 1969) is striking and I wondered if that was why this name was chosen. It is confirmed that 'Condign' was the word used to describe the report. The word 'Condign' was randomly generated and any similarity with the word 'Condon' is purely coincidental.
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 160 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.