Documents / Document

Project Condign (DEFE 24/2090)

Internet Archive (DocumentCloud mirror of Telegraph upload) · 160 pages · text by OCR

This MoD file, titled UFOs - Persistent Correspondence - Dr David Clarke, holds Dr David Clarke's Freedom of Information requests and emails to the Directorate of Air Staff from 2005 to 2008. Clarke asked for the DI55 report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region and for Rendlesham papers. He also sought records about Nick Pope. Other items include an internal review that released redacted passages on plasmas, the MoD's statement that it had no report of the 2008 South Wales police helicopter sighting, and a 2009 disposal form.

  • p. 8 …They reported their encounter to senior officers who then passed it "to Britain's UFO investigators…
  • p. 13 …internal discussions concerning public statements made by a former desk officer on the subject of UFOs…
  • p. 15 example, in an interview published by the International UFO Reporter (fall 1996, pg 18) Mr Pope…
  • p. 22 …The three questions you raised regarding the 'UAP Report' are currently being addressed and a separate…
  • p. 36 …As I mentioned, I spoke with Section40 glad to report my initial advice wasn't too…
  • p. 43 …the DIS decision to no longer receive UFO reports. Paragraph 3 and a few words in…
  • p. 49 …As you will be aware, our only interest in UFO sighting reports is to establish whether…
  • p. 51 …Finally, I wondered if you have any information on any imminent releases of UFO-related files…
  • p. 52 …As you will be aware, our only interest in UFO sighting reports is to establish whether…
  • p. 54 …As you will be aware, our only interest in UFO sighting reports is to establish whether…
  • p. 56 …As a result, I wish to request an internal review of the decision to redact information…
  • p. 58 …As a result, I wish to request an internal review of the decision to redact information…
  • p. 60 …As you will be aware, our only interest in UFO sighting reports is to establish whether…
  • p. 63 …As a result, I wish to request an internal review of the decision to redact information…
  • p. 66 …author of the report and members of the public who have reported UFO sightings. This information…
  • p. 69 …a unique report and in view of the continuing high profile of the 'UFO' phenomenon, it…
  • p. 76 …a unique report and in view of the continuing high profile of the 'UFO' phenomenon, it…
  • p. 144 …the Report ) was classified SECRET UK EYES ONLY. Interestingly I have found on my UFO policy…
  • p. 158 …report. You will be aware that MoD has stated consistently that the topic of UFOs was…
  • p. 159 …These may contain the description "Unexplained Lights" or "UFO report from RAF Woodbridge" as the case…
the very small selection of reports from credible witnesses that we have been sending them". Do you have anything on your policy file that shows we were told in writing? If not, I can only assume we were told over the telephone.

8. File D/DI55/108/15 Pt 4 - I wish to modify my request to encompass a search of the file enclosures between the years 1980 to 1996 for documents relating to the Rendlesham Forest UFO incident. I would be particularly interested to see any documents dated between 1981 and 1984 relating to the report received from the USAF at Woodbridge. This may contain the description "Unexplained Lights" or UFO report from RAF Woodbridge" as the case is described in the Sec(AS) file released in 2002.

I note from your e-mail of 29 September that you hold three documents which mention the Rendlesham Forest incident. The Lt Col Halt memo has already been released. The other two papers may not be relevant to the request. Between 1980 and the release of our file in 2002 there has been lots of public, press and ministerial interest in this case and there is therefore bound to be papers dotted throughout our files which mention Rendlesham (I think your two papers could fall into this category). I do not think this is what Dr Clarke is looking for. I think he is seeking contemporary documents (or those produced soon after) which shed further light on the events and might have been missed when our file was released.

9. Could DIS confirm a) that the chronological dates of enclosures in the DI55 file cover the years 1971-1996 (these appear on the description of the file you supplied in a list attached to a letter dated 2004) and b) the file was not among those searched by DAS staff in 2001-2 when MOD assembled the contents of the Rendlesham file now available on the Publication Scheme.

a) I note from your e-mail of 29 September that this file covers 1971 to December 1995. I will inform Dr Clarke of this. b) I do not think that this file was amongst those searched for papers on Rendlesham, but as there appears to be hardly any additional papers, I do not think this matters.

10. With regard to your letter of 21 July 2005 in response to my requests you enclosed two copies of letters copied from the file D/DS8/10/209 Pt F... Presumably, prior to 26 August 1983 Section 40 exchanged memos with Defence Records and received a reply which allowed her to frame her response to Section 40. This would presumably be filed between enclosures E40 and E58. Could you please provide a copy of the relevant papers.

I have checked the file and there is no such correspondence. may well have just telephoned Defence Records. I will inform Dr Clarke.

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 160 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.