Documents / Document

Project Condign (DEFE 24/2090)

Internet Archive (DocumentCloud mirror of Telegraph upload) · 160 pages · text by GLM-OCR

This MoD file, titled UFOs - Persistent Correspondence - Dr David Clarke, holds Dr David Clarke's Freedom of Information requests and emails to the Directorate of Air Staff from 2005 to 2008. Clarke asked for the DI55 report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region and for Rendlesham papers. He also sought records about Nick Pope. Other items include an internal review that released redacted passages on plasmas, the MoD's statement that it had no report of the 2008 South Wales police helicopter sighting, and a 2009 disposal form.

  • p. 28 …the £600 limit for processing of the whole file (if MoD supply an estimate in advance…
  • p. 126 …5) If you intend to release the Executive Summary in advance of the full (or partial…
  • p. 143 …With reference to request (2) please could you provide an advance summary of the title and…
  • p. 154 …With reference to request (2) please could you provide an advance summary of the title and…
  • p. 156 …With reference to request (2) please could you provide an advance summary of the title and…

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

## Section 40

From: Section 40

FINCLOSURE

14

NUMBER

Sent: 17 November 2005 13:44

To: Section 40

Subject: RE: FOI Policy - Security Classifications

## Section 40

Thanks. The only problem is this was Secret UK Eyes Only. The document was originated and held by DIS (DAS were not on the original distribution) who downgraded it and authorised its release to Dr Clarke. I have sent your e-mail to DIS for advice.

## Section 40

DAS-FOI

From: Section 40

Sent: 17 November 2005 11:32

To:Section 40

Subject: RE: FOI Policy - Security Classifications

We see no problem with telling the applicant unless there were sensitivities with the original classification (i.e. it is UK Eyes only or something similar) If this is not the case then I don't see that being a problem.

Regards,

Section 40

Section 40

Info-AccessPol1

Section 40

MB 6/E/11

Section 40

From: Section 40

Sent: 17 November 2005 11:26

To: Section 40

Subject: FOI Policy - Security Classifications

Importance: High

## Section

Do you know if there is any particular policy regarding the removal of security classifications from released documents?. We have released some documents which were originally classified SECRET but following a FOI request were downgraded by the originating branch to unclassified. On release the original security classification was redacted because it no longer applied and was not therefore relevant. The applicant is a social historian and has asked if he can be told what the original classification was.

Section 40

DAS-FOI

5-H-13

Section 40

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 160 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.