Documents / Document

Project Blue Book file: Trinidade Island, 16 Jan 1958

USAF via The Black Vault · 54 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Project Blue Book file from the USAF, released via The Black Vault, covers the 16 January 1958 sighting at Trindade Island. Its record card says two Rio de Janeiro newspapers printed photos of an alleged flying saucer taken from a Brazilian naval ship, and that ONI analysis judged them a hoax. The file also holds galley proofs from a Menzel book arguing the Barauna photographs were faked, plus APRO Bulletin and NICAP material.

  • p. 6 …The Navy has no connection with the case, and its only connection with the occur- rence…
  • p. 9 …In spite of the widespread and increasing skepticism, the weekly mag:1zine 0 Cruzeiro used the…
  • p. 11 …With the type of camera used, the operation would have heen sim- ple. He was aga…
  • p. 12 …The Navy's study of the negatives reveaJed several dubious fea- tures. The details of the…
  • p. 18 …The UAO Photos Authent ica ted by the Brazilian Navy In early January, 1958, the ship…
  • p. 19 …time-intervals I had used to photograph t he object, three Navy officers with chronometers registered…
  • p. 20 …by a Navy telegraphist-scrgeant- also at Trindade. A box camera had been used. I was…
  • p. 21 …S., in a military report in - forming the Navy about sightings made in that country. A…
  • p. 26 …The shutter speed of 1/ 25 second used would be enough to "stop" an object goi…
  • p. 28 …The negatives are normal." This wrilten photo lab report was signed and sent to the Navy…
  • p. 30 …He told us a startling story. He said that the first UAO sightings over Fernando No…
  • p. 44 …Brazilian Navy, In fact they made n) 1. False, 2. False, 3. Becc.use 1 & 2…
  • p. 52 …b) Rankow, as a member of NICAP,will use any information presented to him to discredit…
ROB MERCERQuestion regarding the release of information to Ral ph Rankow on the Saldahana
photos.
PQI NTS TO BE CONSIDERED:
~ Rankow. Represents NICAP , and is a photographer, not a photo interpreter.
a) NICAP's position, as per the attached t wo it ems taken from"UFO EVIDENCE".
b) Rankow, as a member of NICAP,will use any information presented to him
to discredit th e Air Force , if possible .
69lllgressional inquiry . Will Rankm,r contact congresK1
a) If g iven th e ONI r eport, only if the information can be considered as
detrimental to t he Air Force, and in this case probably ~ anyway
claiming that the Air Force should not eegard the photos as a hoax (based
on the ONI analysis) without having examined the negatives themselves.
b) Pr obably yes, if not given the fiNI report char g ing that the Air Force is
witho lding information, and tr y to force the informatio n tnrough congress.
c) No matter what the Air Force does in t his case the ONI report will be
used against us , either as a charge of witholding information or as a
charge of incorrect evaluation, (NICAP's position, not the Air Forces)
or rath e r no evaluation at all, since we accepted the Navy r eport.
0. RELEASE O~ ;!" HE ONI REPORT: .~- fU::fNl-T
~ f--;'lq \&b 1 1 Gi . e €tlC ........ll:i-I-&J4!:f:-tig=of - liff&'Fi'lla:t=ronc: i
- :;::JJ"1:'tC.C k:rE
pxT1- iOffit. I don't feel that the congressional membe r would release the report ""~
without approval of the State Department knowing its contents . Rankow ~ ould then
accuse the congressman of wi tholding that part of the report not r elating to the UFO
or ac cept his word that all UFO info rmation had been released.

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 54 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.