Documents / Document

Project Blue Book case file, Chiles-Whitted (PDF)

The Black Vault · 162 pages · text by GLM-OCR

This Project Blue Book case file, released through The Black Vault, collects records on the 24 July 1948 sighting by two Eastern Airlines pilots of a wingless object about 20 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. It contains teletype replies from military bases reporting no aircraft movements, a 1948 Project Sign special investigation report with an interview of a Robins Air Force Base witness, and a December 1948 intelligence report. It also includes newspaper extracts, a Harvard College Observatory letter and Hynek's Project Grudge evaluation index.

  • p. 7 …of the new research and of approval of new treatments, respectively, should be an advance. P…
  • p. 72 …advance of presently known engines. POWER SOURCES: (a) The foregoing discussion is predicated upon the assumption…
  • p. 89 …advance of presently known engines. POWER SOURCES (a) The foregoing discussion is predicated upon the assumption…

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

or mechanical disturbance when the object passed that witness, the passenger, did not repeat any no balance or rocking of the plane. Some of the later versions of the incident gloss over these facts. however, and thus exaggerate the startling nature of the sighting. One account subtly implies the presence of a pilot in the UFO [22] and several state that, as the object passed, the plane hit turbulent air [7, p. 61] or was "rocked" by the UFO [20, p. 21].

Like most eye-witness descriptions of a startling event, the testimony of the three men differed. Chiles stated that at the front of the UFO was a lighted pilot compartment or cockpit with a "snout" similar to a radar pole, and that a kind of nozzle projected from the rear from which the flames fanned out to a width of some twenty to thirty feet. Whitted did not see a cockpit, a snout, or a rear nozzle; he thought the flames flared out from the entire rear and were never any wider than the width of the UFO itself. The third witness, the passenger, saw no shape or form, only an intensely brilliant streak of light that appeared and vanished before he was able to focus his eyes. As responsible officers, both pilots had obviously tried to separate the observed phenomena from their interpretation. They differed widely on the estimated distance of the UFO (the passenger did not offer an estimate). Chiles thought it passed them with a margin of only about 700 feet, but Whitted believed the distance to be more than ten times greater, about a mile and a half. However, when we remember that these men had the UFO in sight for only a small fraction of a minute and that their study of the side view ("windows," "cockpit," etc.) must have been limited to the instant of passing, these disagreements are not remarkable.

When Captain Chiles and Lieutenant Whitted reported their frightening experience, the Air Force made a prompt investigation. Since Captain Chiles explicitly stated his belief that the UFO was under intelligent control, the case required careful consideration. A

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 162 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.