Documents / Document

Package compiled for FAA managers

FAA via National Archives / The Black Vault · 122 pages · text from the file's own layer

This package was compiled by the FAA Alaskan Region Public Affairs Office in Anchorage and sent to FAA managers with a memo from Paul Steucke dated March 5, 1987. It gathers material on the November 17, 1986 sighting by the crew of Japan Air Lines flight 1628: a news release, pilot and controller transcripts, crew interviews and radar analysis. The FAA concluded that it could not confirm the event. It attributed the second radar target to a split, uncorrelated return from the JAL Boeing 747 and planned no further investigation.

  • p. 3 …Investi gation of Japan Air Lines flight 1628 Sighting of Unidentified Air Traffic on November 17…
  • p. 5 …but •.• JL1628 = Japan Air Lines flight #1628 Rl.5 = Controller positicn, Anchorage Air Route Traffic Control…
  • p. 7 …sixty one line. Approach. Look at your radar. We got a Japan Air one six~ eight…
  • p. 82 …a report concerning the incident to Japan Airlines Flight 1628 (JL1628) north of Fairbanks, Alaska on…
  • p. 107 …86 unidentified object sighting by Japan Air Lines flight 1628. (5 pages) PLEASE COMPLETE AND RETURN…
K. Terauchi But we came this way. Full moon (unintelligible) Greenland,
a!ter we, we cross ah Greenland we saw moon right side
(unintelligible) ••• but moon move to ah behind us so when
crossing the Canadian, Canadian, ah, FLR (unintelligible) so
maybe ah moon, ah .stay near the horizon, so we couldn't use the
mo·on light.
R. Gordon Ah uh, I understand.
K. Terauchi (Japanese)
R. Gordon So the moon was very low?
K. Terauchi Very low, very low, okay.
R. Gordon That's good, I appreciate you bringing that up, I didn't think
about the moon, but that's good.
K. Terauchi Full moon, full moon, was very low, full moon.
R. Gordon Well that's good, I'm glad you folks did that, uh •••
K. Terauchi So ah,
R. Gordon There's one last question •••
? Yes
R. Gordon This, and it's just threw it in here, is there anything else that
.· I didn't ask you that you could help us sort this thing out?
K. Terauchi Ah, yes, they
R. Gordon Frank, see how that tapes doing. We still got plenty?
F. Fujii Yes, ah uh.
R. Gordon That's good, because the mike is right there that's super.
K. Terauchi See it is recoil blasting, just a little bit high here, it is
blasting jets, then if it was at the same altitude as we were, I
assume they are using an atomic energy, there will be some
radiation left on our aircraft. Also the other is, that air
turbulance be created. So they did not want to leave any
evidence of their existance. Also the reason, why they were
there (position) is that they wanted to leave no evidence. See
it is round, the air current goes this way (he is drawing a
picture), see if they were at the same altitude, they would
create air turbulance, but they never positioned when the air
turbulance would disturb us.
R. Gordon Those are the small one now~
14

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 122 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.