Documents / Document

Package compiled for FAA managers

FAA via National Archives / The Black Vault · 122 pages · text from the file's own layer

This package was compiled by the FAA Alaskan Region Public Affairs Office in Anchorage and sent to FAA managers with a memo from Paul Steucke dated March 5, 1987. It gathers material on the November 17, 1986 sighting by the crew of Japan Air Lines flight 1628: a news release, pilot and controller transcripts, crew interviews and radar analysis. The FAA concluded that it could not confirm the event. It attributed the second radar target to a split, uncorrelated return from the JAL Boeing 747 and planned no further investigation.

  • p. 108 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files For the Following Originals - Manuscripts, Books, Graphic Illustrations, Artwork, Maps…
  • p. 109 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files Author Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative (FADGI) - Still Image Working Group…
  • p. 110 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files II /
  • p. 111 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files 'I I )
  • p. 112 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files iii - I )
  • p. 113 …Master files These Guidelines provide technical approaches to the creation of raster image (pixel-based) master…
  • p. 114 Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group -August 2010 ln general, master files have the…
  • p. 115 …Also, depending on the intended usage of the master files. there may be a practical limit…
  • p. 116 …We acknowledge that the workflow described in these guidelines to produce RGB master files may incur…
  • p. 117 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files 6 --- ' )
  • p. 118 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files 7
  • p. 119 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files 8 ---- I )
  • p. 120 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files 9 )
  • p. 121 …Creation of Raster Image Master Files 10 _J_
  • p. 122 …Creation of Raster Image Master Fil es 11
Federal Agencies Digitization Initiative Still Image Working Group - August 2010
- SIGNAL -
"' SFR - Spatial Frequency Response - ( ISO 12233, I SO 16067- 1, ISO 16067-2, I SO 15524)
c: MTF - Modulation Transfer Function-~~
·g.~ definition : A spatial frequency descriptor of an imaging system's ability to maintain the relative contrast of input stimuli
w
Si:!rnl:lliog Bate Resolution Sharneoing A !::l.lti!m;~ ffitre. Q~i;itb Qf~l.l:i
Definition: The Definirion: An lm"!llng Defim/Jon :Amplificatio n or the SFR Definit:iotr. An objective Derlflition : o s "rty Defimlicn: Tl>e d/Sfance
QI reciprocal of !11e system's aoillty to resol\/e by means of image processi ng to SFR based metric that Is or wide spreading olong tire optical ains 1-nrNn ilCa!ptab/e
<hSlance between The 1...,,1 of spatial detail U1at perceiived image frx:us.
Closest adjacent can resolved 1n an Image sharpness.
pixels. The number or
samples per unit
distance.
• Megapixels - Blurred - Oversharpening ( haloing, garish • Sharp - Low oontrast • Deptl1 ol field
]l •~ • Dots per Inell (dpi) - So~ edges) - Hazy • Cirde ol oonfusion
• Pixels per Inch (ppi) - Sharp - Snap - Ghosting • Focus tolerance
~i~ • Samplng frequency - In/Out of locus - Edgy, Sharp, Crisp • Yelling nare • Hyperfocal distance
~ ~ - Spherical aberration - Edge enhancement • Glare
"O - Spatial de!illi - Unsharp masking - Integrating cavity
effect f!CEl
e :The number d e :10% sampling ef'ficiEncy e: Max SFR gain e: Area under 111e SFR •%Rare - e :Distance alOflll the
~ i captured or based on Luminance SFR units: % SFR resPonse as weigh!Ed by an units: (unit less) optical axis that remains
de!M!red pixels per units: ( unit less) appropriately chosen In aa:eptable locus
~j unit distance In botl1 visual oontrast function. units: inches, mm.
N~~ tl1e horilolltal and • : Min/Max 10% spatial units: TBD
vertical dimensions frequency limits of l.IJmlnance
5 ! units: dots - per ~inch , SFR
II urits: dot cvdes/ mm
~ ~ o pixels·per-lnch w : Min/Max 50% spatial w : Siiln of SFR slope
~ - "' trequency limits of Luminance units : positilleJ negative Slope
rtid::
~ II SFR vaf!Je
• urits: dol, cvcles/mm
- Poor canbration • Poor (auto) focus • OVer aggressive sharpening - Op(lcal performance - Dirty lens • Poor F-nll!lber choice
., QJ ~ technique • Poor optics settings exx:eeds sampling rate • Light source
~~ • Wrong choice or • Poor choice of apertUre stop - I nsumoent sig nal to amplify dlrea:ed into lens
units at callbratlon - Mechanical vibration - llllnl<ing that If a little Is good • Poor quality lens
~ 42 13 • Oller" aggressive rolse !11en more must be better. - Stray light
control
Technical Guidelines for Digitizing Cultural Heritage Materia ls: Creation of Raster Image Master Files 10
_J_

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 122 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.