Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 15 …Ramey Col William H. Blanchard Maj Gen Clements McMullen Brig Gen Donald N. Yates Albert P…
  • p. 29 …Similarly, two authors, William L. Moore and Charles Berlitz, also engaged in research which led them…
  • p. 31 …The Roswell Incident (1980) by William Moore and Charles Berlitz; "Crashed Saucers: Evidence in Search of…
  • p. 206 …incident"( it was in about 1980 that William Moore contacted me and asked questions about balloons…
  • p. 217 …the books that have been written by William Moore, and Randall Schmidt, and others, a lot…
  • p. 254 PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 38 diameter General Mills balloons. We had a very successful set…
  • p. 262 …One thing I should mention is that after I had visited from William Moore around •so…
  • p. 760 …Ben17 Itammenzind Ralph Morrell James Smith William lneer Duties Qualifications Computations & Equip- Undergraduate Elec. ment Construction…
Fli~a 2~ through. 39: 'l'hey were made from Alamogordo, New Mexico during
Wove er and December, 1947 to test ballast controls and to develop a
launching technique satisfactory for high winds. The period of data re-
ception by radio 'W&.S too short in all of' these flights to permit much e"Y8.lua-
tion of the altitude controls. On three flights (33, 35 and 39) a Fergusem
meteorograph was added to the train to record flight pressure; of 11 balloons
released, only these three were not recovered.
On seven flights the pressure signals reoeind by radiosonde were lost
while the balloon was still rising; Flight 38 was a shrouded neoprene
balloon which burst as 1t became .fullJ and Flight 39 was a polyethylene
balloon which burst at or near its ceiling f'ollowing a very rapid rise.
( 1his was the first balloon to burst using a short external appendix with
stiffeners.}
On the .other two flights (30 and 35) a very short period of level flight
was recorded before the balloon-borne radio transmitter passed out of range.
Besides these two, several other .001" polyethylene
were maintained at constant or near-constant levels for
can be seen from their points or recovery (Figure 13).
seen descending 18 hours after release.
Figure 13
balloons probably
several hours, as
One balloon was
On Flights 29 through 33 only a fixed ballast leak was used, set for
flows of from 300 to 600 grams per hour. Other fllghtl used automatic
ballast controls. Although these fixed leaks seemed to be sufficient to keep
the balloons aloft, there was no clear evidence as to what amount would be
needed for most efficient operation. The need for a system of ballast
metering was indicated in this series o.f flights.
-19-

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.