Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 225 …Well, Boford was Navy, that was the Navy .•• Q: Like taking a Pi Ball reading now…
  • p. 226 …fabricate balloons for us. During that period we heard of the Navy project that was going…
  • p. 242 …But were any of those used as precursors to Mogul or ••. A: None whatsoever. That was…
  • p. 319 …Ewing had conducted considerable research for the Navy during World War II, studying, among other things…
  • p. 789 …for six hours using a non-extensible envelope vri th the addition of a balla.st…
  • p. 801 …Vet Gifford ;.;ho has 0 0' sea rescue boat this project is planning to use. Stayed…
  • p. 802 …tlyckoff, Hungerfield, 'faux and ~yself regarding Navy participation with us in Crossroads. Captain Kellogg of Weather…
  • p. 815 …Schneider up with 0 'Day to check use as NYU station. Alamoggrdo crew helped~.get helium…
in the preceding, section on diffusion end leakage the appendix
opening should be small. It can be seen that as we make one
of our conditions better, we must sacrifice at least one of
the others. Therefore, balloons must be designed compromising
rate of rise, balloon thickness, and appendix opening. Methods
of decreasing the eppendix opening, except during the valving
of lifting. gas, are discussed in other sections of this tech•
r.ical report. In general they consist of means of applying
a delicate relief valve, capable of opening to a lerge area
with af!)lication of only slight intems.l pressure, and also
closing tight upon release of this internal pressure.
G. A Ge.tleral Equa.ttc:m of Motion
If we collect and relate the variables incidental to balloon flight,
we may form a general equation of motion. This is most easily ex-
pressed in terms of forces acting upon the balloon systell'.. We may
equate e.n acceleration term plus a drag or friction term against r
term to include all other forces: ·
(1)
This is a differential equation of a type common in mechanical vi-
bration problems, end solution for the variable Z would not be
difficult if relationships of the many variables included in the
the terms n and IF were simple. However, the cornplexi~ of the
balloon system introduces many terms as pe.rts of n and 2; F •
We shall first state the more complex form of equation (1) above
and then attempt to explain tre variables included in each part of
the equation. As will be shown, it is extremely difficult to find
a complete sol•Jtion of the equation since nany of the variables
are in themselves extremely complex and at this time incapable of
accurate solution. Therefor~, our ~iscussion will be more of a
qualitative rather than a quantitative nature.
The general force equation is:
(2) fo2i!+C ~A(Di!f= Vb(P0 -P9 )-W±Fotm
The force due to acceleration
where: FA : t rfe
W : weight of the balloon system
g : acceleration of gravity
021: = acceleration of the balloon system (ln
acceleration in the direction of greater
altitude is considered positive.)
-56-

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.