Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 29 …Since 1978-1980, other UFO researchers, most notably Donald Schmitt and Kevin Randle, claim to have…
  • p. 31 …Randle and Donald Schmitt; The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell (1994), also by Randle…
  • p. 159 …I have reviewed the pictures in the 1991 Book by Randle and Schmitt on the UFO…
  • p. 168 …It had been alleged in a number ofbooks, including the one by Randle and Schmitt, that…
  • p. 170 …I went through and pulled out wherever, in this book UFO Crash at Roswell by Randle…
  • p. 171 …From the very start, when these clowns started hounding me, Randle and Schmitt, I told they…
  • p. 176 …He makes a number of claims that, at least Randle and Schmitt; and when I say…
  • p. 178 …risk injury to civiliaDs on the ground. Randle asked if he remembered my talk at aD…
  • p. 190 …Well, of course, Randle and Schmitt do claim that those people are out there and that…
  • p. 191 …Well, I got a perfect example of this with Randle and Schmitt. Randle is the outgoing…
  • p. 205 …On review of the photos in the Randle/Schmitt book, the material looks like one of…
B-17 CR~
1st Lieutenant Or.en B. Dubell
1st Lieutenant Thomas F. Carroll
1st Lieutenant John Mertzen
Sergeant W. R. Rice
Pilot
Co-Pilot
Navigator
Engineer
Time notification sigi)als were required and provided in order to afford
sufficient time to make necessary launching preparations, and to position the
balloons just a few minutes prior tc the predetermined arrival of the explo-
sion sound wave. Headquarters FITZ\nlliArA FCRI1ARD furnished ARPACAS 3-1 and
3-2 bJ' officer courier. The team experienced no difficulty in obt3ining the
time signals.
Reports required of the team were a brief statement as tc positive or
negative results of the tests, and notification of team moveme:1t to it's
several locations. Reports of results were made to He~dquarters FITZif.ILLlAM
FORWARD and to .Afl~Sf'i-1.
Results of the ~YAJALEIN test were as follows: balloon-borne equipment
results were positive and ground equipment results were questionable. An
accurate final analysis and evaluation report ~ill be submitted upon Dr.
Crary's return to Viatson Laboratories, including an accurate determinatior. of
results.
Due to time limitation and pending a thorough evaluation of results, the
following recom~endations, of necessity, should be c~nsidered tentat~~e:
1. Before departing for field locations, a survey should be ~ade to
determine the best balloon launching sites, giving due consideration to
shelter from high velocity and gusty winds, and sufficient clear space to
lay-out shroud lines and control cables thus affording clear passage at the
instruments which are suspended about one hundred (100) feet below the balloon.
2. That an SCR 658, radiosonde receiver be included in the team equip.
ment list. For these tests, a receiver had to be borrowed from the air
weather station at each location. This presented a problem because each sta-
tion had only one (1) receiver and it was needed by the station personnel for
11pper air sounding operations. This necessitated selecting the best possible
launching si to adjacent to the weather str ,,~.on. Also, this precluded selection
of' a ~ite T-ithout a weather station.
-J-

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.