Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 15 …Ramey Col William H. Blanchard Maj Gen Clements McMullen Brig Gen Donald N. Yates Albert P…
  • p. 29 …Similarly, two authors, William L. Moore and Charles Berlitz, also engaged in research which led them…
  • p. 31 …The Roswell Incident (1980) by William Moore and Charles Berlitz; "Crashed Saucers: Evidence in Search of…
  • p. 206 …incident"( it was in about 1980 that William Moore contacted me and asked questions about balloons…
  • p. 217 …the books that have been written by William Moore, and Randall Schmidt, and others, a lot…
  • p. 254 PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 38 diameter General Mills balloons. We had a very successful set…
  • p. 262 …One thing I should mention is that after I had visited from William Moore around •so…
  • p. 760 …Ben17 Itammenzind Ralph Morrell James Smith William lneer Duties Qualifications Computations & Equip- Undergraduate Elec. ment Construction…
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94
Q: But you had them available for study, but you didn't
launch them.
A: No, they didn't have any.
27
Q: In the New York University report it says that you were
provided two Japanese balloons.
A: That's interesting, because I have no memory of them
whatsoever. Spilhaus may have. But I have no memory that I ever
saw them. In the spirit of being given proper scientific credit,
in the paper that you have, the Journal of Meteorology Paper,
we, heavily written by Spilhaus, credited the Japanese with
doing, with their trans-Pacific flights. So what we were doing
certainly was based, came after what they had done, and we didn't
want to take credit away from them. But I'm told that on my own,
completely free from this, I talked with Wadati and others on a
Japanese balloon. I've never seen a Japanese balloon that I know
of, I've never seen the payload, but I do have fragments of the
Mulberry Favor.
Frankly, we did not depend on the Japanese balloons. The
Japanese just preceded us. But we didn't pattern what we were
trying to do on what the Japanese did. After all, they had
opaque balloons, and my belief from the beginning is balloons
ought to be transparent so they don't absorb sunlight so at
sunset you don't have the cooling and the ballasting. So we owe
nothing to the Japanese other than the fact they were ahead of
us.
Q: You went on these field trips. When you left, getting
back to the cover story, you were the project engineer. Did
people come to you and say you need to put something together in
case one of these things falls in somebody's hands?
You didn't.
Did you brief your people, your personnel, when they were
there, that they if should go into town for food or something if
someone says "Why are you there?" •••
A: We were certainly secretive and not talkative, but at
the same time •••
Q: In other words, was there a developed cover story where
everyone got together, discussed what you were going to say or
not say concerning the various activities that were going on at
Alamagordo and other locations?
A: That's a good question. I have no memory of such a
thing. I'm just aware that we were under very strong stricture
not to encourage speculation on what we were doing.

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.