Documents / FOIA release

roswell

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 993 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Roswell Report: Fact versus Fiction in the New Mexico Desert was published in 1995 by Headquarters United States Air Force. It was written in response to Representative Steven H. Schiff's request and a General Accounting Office audit, and it contains Col. Richard L. Weaver's report and 1st Lt. James McAndrew's synopsis, along with attachments, appendices and photographs. The report says researchers found no evidence of an extraterrestrial craft or crew. It concludes that the 1947 debris came from a Project MOGUL balloon train.

  • p. 15 …Ramey Col William H. Blanchard Maj Gen Clements McMullen Brig Gen Donald N. Yates Albert P…
  • p. 29 …Similarly, two authors, William L. Moore and Charles Berlitz, also engaged in research which led them…
  • p. 31 …The Roswell Incident (1980) by William Moore and Charles Berlitz; "Crashed Saucers: Evidence in Search of…
  • p. 206 …incident"( it was in about 1980 that William Moore contacted me and asked questions about balloons…
  • p. 217 …the books that have been written by William Moore, and Randall Schmidt, and others, a lot…
  • p. 254 PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 38 diameter General Mills balloons. We had a very successful set…
  • p. 262 …One thing I should mention is that after I had visited from William Moore around •so…
  • p. 760 …Ben17 Itammenzind Ralph Morrell James Smith William lneer Duties Qualifications Computations & Equip- Undergraduate Elec. ment Construction…
PROFESSOR MOORE - 6/8/94 6
Q: w.w. Brazel mentions eyelets which appear in the
reflectors. There's also, on the polyethylene balloons, the
shroud however you had it hooked on there. There's eyelets
around the base. There was a ring at the neck of the balloon and
then there were attach points to that ring, were there not?
A: But there were no eyelets.
Q: I believe there were. I've reviewed the New York
University documents and there's a very clear depiction in one of
them of eyelets.
A: Okay, I was thinking of the later ••• Here are the NYU
reports, the originals of them.
Q: In one of the configurations they clearly show eyelets
in the drawing.
Q: Going back to Brazel, you state that you think it could
not be one of the polyethylene balloons. He indicates in this
newspaper article that he actually found the debris in mid-June,
however it didn't subsequently come out until July.
A: You're right. That is in one of the polyethylene
balloons, you're correct. I fall back on my plea that my memory
isn't ...
Q:
about.
It comes into depending on what Brazel was speaking
A: There are clearly eyelets here. In fact there's a
little swivel.
He talks about the smoky gray rubber ••.
Q: Which these samples here, as you say, if they'd only
been out for a short time, a matter of days, smoky gray, that's a
very good description of what they looked like.
A: And when you first retrieve it has a bad odor. And
people talked about there being a burned odor.
We need to talk about these neoprene balloons because they
came in different ..• There were two manufacturers-- one, Dewey
& Olney in Cambridge manufactured with a dip process and they had
very much the appearance, if you will, of a condom. They were an
ivory colored jell. The Kaysam company in Patterson made a cast
neoprene emulsion into a mold~ and then they inflated the mold.
They had to put a lot of plasticizers so they could take this wet
jell and inflate it and make it into a meteorologic balloon.
This is a Kaysam balloon here, which I think is not a good
candidate.
Q: Kaysam?

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 993 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.