Documents / Report

Historical Record Report Volume 1 March 8 2024

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 63 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Department of Defense's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) released this report in February 2024. It is Volume I of its Historical Record Report on U.S. Government involvement with UAP. AARO reviewed official investigations since 1945, searched archives and conducted about 30 interviews. It found no evidence that any sighting represented extraterrestrial technology, and no evidence that the government or private companies reverse-engineer such technology. The report attributes such claims to misidentified authentic programs and circular reporting.

  • p. 2 …19 The Condon Report (April 1968) .............................................................................................. 19 National Academy of Sciences Assessment of the Condon Report…
  • p. 13 …Report, and the University of Colorado’s Condon Report (contracted by the USAF). Some of these…
  • p. 19 …study.43 The Condon Report (April 1968) Background: Dr. Edward U. Condon, a physicist and former…
  • p. 20 …The Condon panel determined that these claims most likely were false.49 National Academy of Sciences…
  • p. 21 …new significant findings on UFOs since the Condon Report. Results: Five months later, NASA responded by…
  • p. 50 …44 “The Condon Report,” https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0680976.pdf, https://files.ncas.org…
38
Public Interest
Segments of the American public have been interested in this topic since the term “flying
saucer” emerged after Arnold’s sighting in 1947, as evidenced by the proliferation of television,
books, movies, and podcasts today on the topic. The subject is deeply rooted in popular culture
with its own themes, mythologies, and conspiracy theories. Capt Ruppelt, who was involved
with three UFO investigations efforts, including being the initial leader of Project BLUE BOOK,
noted that there would be spikes in reported sightings after official press events mentioning
UFOs; suggesting that reports of sightings can influence the incidence of additional reported
sightings.124
Alleged Bureaucratic Barriers
Alleged bureaucratic barriers including indifference, cognitive dissonance, lack of
support or resources, and deliberate obstruction are also similarities. Some members of
investigatory panels have claimed official obstruction, ranging from lack of access to senior
decision-makers to insufficient staff and resources.
Insufficient Data and Information
Previous and current investigations have been challenged by insufficient data and
information for intelligence and scientific analysis to resolve anomalous incidents. Insufficient
data and information was compounded by inconsistent reporting and lack of continuity among
investigations and investigative practices. Capt Ruppelt, the first director of Project BLUE
BOOK, noted that the inability to collect the UFO’s altitude, size, and speed was a recurring and
significant obstacle to resolving cases.125 A similar challenge remains today, even with the
advancement in technology. Most UAP sightings have no data associated with them beyond an
often vague narrative account; and when there is hard data, it is often incomplete or of poor
quality. In terms of military reporting, the sensors on which UAP most frequently are captured
are calibrated and optimized for combat. UAP are not routinely captured by exquisite, high-
definition, multi-capability, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance collection platforms—
a threshold which is often required to successfully resolve a case.
Perceived Deception
There is a conviction among some Americans that the USG has conducted a deception
operation to conceal the fact that it has recovered extraterrestrial spacecraft and alien beings as
well as systematically exploited and reverse-engineered extraterrestrial technology.126 This
perception probably has been fueled by key UFO investigators’ public comments. For example,
J. Allen Hynek of Project BLUE BOOK, said that the USAF expected him to perform the role of
debunker; and Capt Ruppelt, the first chief of BLUE BOOK, later wrote that he was expected to
explain away every report and that the USAF sought to produce press stories in alignment with
the USAF’s position.127

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 63 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.