Documents / Report

Historical Record Report Volume 1 March 8 2024

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 63 pages · text from the file's own layer

The Department of Defense's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) released this report in February 2024. It is Volume I of its Historical Record Report on U.S. Government involvement with UAP. AARO reviewed official investigations since 1945, searched archives and conducted about 30 interviews. It found no evidence that any sighting represented extraterrestrial technology, and no evidence that the government or private companies reverse-engineer such technology. The report attributes such claims to misidentified authentic programs and circular reporting.

  • p. 2 …16 The Robertson Panel (January 1953) ........................................................................................ 17 The Durant Report (February 1953).......................................................................................... 17 Project BLUE BOOK…
  • p. 10 …the year of the standup of the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Application Program (AAWSAP) and Advanced…
  • p. 19 …represented technological or scientific advances outside of a terrestrial framework. The committee’s primary recommendation was…
  • p. 20 …be justified in the expectation that science will be advanced thereby.” The panel cautioned against support…
  • p. 22 …the DIA to assess long-term and over-the-horizon foreign advanced aerospace threats to the…
  • p. 27 …Even with the significant advancements in ground- and air- based sensors, the apparent inability to collect…
  • p. 35 …The oral history project will include gathering all information pertaining to the location of advanced aerospace…
  • p. 37 …represent technological advances that could pose counterintelligence and national security threats. Secrecy The USG’s need…
  • p. 38 …A similar challenge remains today, even with the advancement in technology. Most UAP sightings have no…
  • p. 39 …witnessed new technological advancements and testing and reporting them as UFOs. The below examples represent formerly…
  • p. 43 …The Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) oversaw the development of HAVE Blue in the mid…
  • p. 44 …The prototype served as the basis for a more advanced design under DARPA.176 It was…
  • p. 45 45 Polecat Lockheed Martin’s Advanced Development Program organization, also known as “Skunk Works” developed the…
  • p. 60 …https://www.astronomy.com/space-exploration/from-space-to-museum-showcase- the-space-shuttles-final-mission…
  • p. 61 …Advanced Research Projects Agency, “Predator.” https://www.darpa.mil/about- us/timeline/predator; Strickland, “The Early…
34
• All the programs assessed to be authentic were or—if still active—continue to be,
appropriately reported to either or both the congressional defense and intelligence
committees.
Process for Protecting Sensitive Programs while Investigating Interviewee Claims
AARO instituted a secure process for handling information to allow interviewees to come
forward to provide their statements to AARO within secure facilities. AARO established a
partnership with the Special Access Program Control Offices for the DoD, IC, and DHS to
review programs identified in interviews by name or description to determine if the programs
correlated in time and location to historic SAP or Controlled Access Programs (CAP). This
agreement details how interviewee claims concerning the names and descriptions of the alleged
programs are handled, stored, and protected so that their veracity can be determined in a secure
manner. A key part of this agreement is that AARO investigators have been granted full access
to all pertinent sensitive USG programs.
• When industry partners were named, AARO interviewed senior level, appropriately-
cleared executives, department leads, senior scientists, and engineers.
Findings
One Private Program Mistaken for USG Program
AARO determined that the following alleged USG program name was portrayed
inaccurately by the interviewee:
• Virtual Institute for Satellite Integration Training–This program is not a USG-funded
and supported effort. It was a program operated by a private UAP organization and
had a NASA engineer as a participant. NASA verified that it did not sponsor the
project.113
KONA BLUE: A Proposed UAP Recovery and Reverse-Engineering Program
KONA BLUE was brought to AARO’s attention by interviewees who claimed that it was
a sensitive DHS compartment to cover up the retrieval and exploitation of “non-human
biologics.”114 KONA BLUE traces its origins to the DIA-managed AAWSAP/AATIP program,
which was funded through a special appropriation and executed by its primary contractor, a
private sector organization. DIA cancelled the program in 2012 due to lack of merit and the
utility of the deliverables. As discussed in Section IV of this report, while the official purpose of
AAWSAP/AATIP was to conduct research into 12 areas of cutting edge science, the contractor
team, and at least one supportive government program manager, also conducted UAP and
paranormal research at a property owned by the private sector organization.
When DIA cancelled this program, its supporters proposed to DHS that they create and
fund a new version of AAWSAP/AATIP under a SAP.115 This proposal, codenamed KONA
BLUE, would restart UAP investigations, paranormal research (including alleged “human
consciousness anomalies”) and reverse-engineer any recovered off-world spacecraft that they
hoped to acquire. This proposal gained some initial traction at DHS to the point where a

Cases discussed

About this file

Report, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 63 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.