Documents / FOIA release

Final Product (FOIA 24-F-0250)

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 2024 · 26 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Office of the Secretary of Defense FOIA release (24-F-0250) centers on a January 8, 2024 AARO memorandum for record. The memo describes the office's repeated attempts through 2023 to interview David Grusch for its Historical Record Report. It concludes that Grusch had no intention of giving AARO information about his claims. The release also includes text messages with Chris Mellon and congressional staff, email exchanges with Grusch, and DoD SAPCO and ODNI CAPCO memos stating that AARO may receive classified and NDA-protected UAP information.

  • p. 4 …It was on the interview Sunday. Pentagon is preparing a response. His assertion that we aren…
  • p. 8 …position of the Pentagon, released to media Tuesday, approved by OGC and the Secretary: 'By law…
  • p. 26 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3200 MAR 08 2023…
• • • „
Chris Mellon @ SI t.
I spoke w Dave and his first question was, "Why hadn't , Two, JtH1 13 all the info from the IC IG? It is all there and fully
documented to include confirmation the program is real from active, Cleared insiders.
DOJ has to release it since it's part of a criminal investigation
They haven't yet
He needs to come tell us separate from his criminal complaint , (0
He obviously doesn't have to do so and he even said "How do I know Sean is not a target of the ongoing criminal
investigation" (I) However, that being said, I
explained your request regarding having his attorney contact OGC and suggested he do so to slum full cooperation.
He said that if you can provide OGC's contact info he'll pass it to his attorney. Btw, he also said his claim about
contacting you dates to a conversation the two of you had many months ago on a 'Tandberg* (sp?) system and that
you didn't follow up after that call. I'm not trying to adjudicate that issue just telling you what he said. Apparently that
is what his statement was referring to. So, if you can provide an OGC email or phone number I'll get that to Dave right
away and hopefully his attorney will promptly contact OGC.
All of that is both absurd and false. I have had a conversation with him for years. If he wants this brought out and
investigated, then yes he obviously does have to. His continued refusal to speak with us only hurts his case.
I've contacted Congressional OGC to reach out to him.
So they can explain the law.
Haven't had a conversation for years
Our statement will simply be that he's refused to speak with AARO ,
OK, sounds good. Happy to help when I can. Don't hesitate to kick my tires if I'm off base on something
Btw, there isn't a Congressional OGC as such.
There are congressional lawyers that get law 13 ,7 ,AmeD
To be clear, whom should Dave expect to hear from if you cannot provide a POC at DoD?
Vet lemi 19,7 A ,„
0

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 26 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.