Documents / FOIA release

Final Product (FOIA 24-F-0250)

Office of the Secretary of Defense · 2024 · 26 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Office of the Secretary of Defense FOIA release (24-F-0250) centers on a January 8, 2024 AARO memorandum for record. The memo describes the office's repeated attempts through 2023 to interview David Grusch for its Historical Record Report. It concludes that Grusch had no intention of giving AARO information about his claims. The release also includes text messages with Chris Mellon and congressional staff, email exchanges with Grusch, and DoD SAPCO and ODNI CAPCO memos stating that AARO may receive classified and NDA-protected UAP information.

  • p. 4 …It was on the interview Sunday. Pentagon is preparing a response. His assertion that we aren…
  • p. 8 …position of the Pentagon, released to media Tuesday, approved by OGC and the Secretary: 'By law…
  • p. 26 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3200 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3200 MAR 08 2023…
From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 10:34
To: David Grusch
Subject: Re: Contact Request
I've been waiting in the lobby over 30 minutes. Are you showing up?
From: David Grusch
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2023 12:24:06 PN/
To
Subject: Re: Contact Request
Good Morning
Thank you for sending these items. As a former agency-level SAPMO and CAPCO I take security policies very seriously. In
the DoD SAPCO memo, the term "UAP-related" is not defined. FY23 NDAA Sec. 1673 Subsection B defines it as the
following:
"any activity or program by a department or agency of the Federal Government or a contractor of
such a department or agency relating to unidentified anomalous phenomena, including with respect to
material retrieval, material analysis, reverse engineering, research and development, detection and
tracking, developmental or operational testing, and security protections and enforcement."
The key issue here is that many of these activities have conventional classified and compartmented Security
Classification Guides that also cover non-UAP activities as well. To discuss the UAP-related activities would also expose
these conventional SAP mission areas. An oral history interview subject must also be absolved of this obligation to
protect this information as well, some of it may be bigoted or WAIVED (lAW DODI 5205.11 and 10 USC Sec 119).
Furthermore, as discussed Friday, I am seeking a ODNI CAPCO determination to absolve an oral history interview subject
of any NDA's relating to UAP-related and adjacent (as stated above) IC CAP information. Additionally, in my particular
case, in order to horizontally protect a portion of my oral history testimony previously provided to ICIG and the
intelligence committees, we would need to conduct the interview at the HCS-Operations (0) Restricted Handling (RH)
level (lAW DNI CAPCO manual Sec. 4). Has the CIA Office of Security (OS) or Directorate of Operations (DO) provided a
memo in this regard for oral history interview subjects? Has the OS provided a memo to also cover managed-need-to-
know (MNTK) projects not directly reported to ODNI CAPCO?
Lastly, what signed policy does AARO have to receive non-title-10 SAPs (ie, DOE and NSC)? Has the EOP NSC Security
Director, Director National Program Management Staff OUSD(I&S), or DOE SAPCO/SAPOC provided a memo similar to
the DoD SAPCO memo you provided?
v/r,
DG
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 8:13 AM
liwrote:
Mr. Grusch,
1
I

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the osd collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 26 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.