Bearden UFOsandUAPs ADA068988

..
24. For reference to Ives' papers and a succinct digest of his work, see M. Ruderfer,
"Neutrino Structure of the Ether," Lettere Al Nuovo Cimento , 8 May, 1975.
25. Note 18, ibid. Also, a two-hour technical presentation, "Soviet Psychotronic
Weapons," was given at the 1978 Annual Symposium of the U.S. Psychotronics Association
at Oglethorpe College, Atlanta, Georgia, August 1978.
26. To prevent the time-squelching effect of the photon interaction in the visible light
spectrum, psychotronic signals may be modulated upon electromagnetic carrier waves.
That is, each "photon" cames a vibratory bit of time caiTier wave along with it, and
the psychotronic pattern may quite comfort:D.bly ride along in that bit of oscillato~, time
as a "modulation" timewise, in and on it. In this fashion a psychotronic pattern that
is identical photon-to-photon (in addition to the ordinary virtual state "noise" patterns
which more or less randomly vary photon-to-photon) may be delivered to an absorbing
target. Inside the target, the photons are absorbed, scattered and reflected. Here one
may speak of the "temperature" in the target of a particular virtual/psychotronic pattern being
delivered to it. As the coherence of that virtual state pattern is increased, photon-to-photon
impinging on the target, the virtual buildup (temperature) of that pattern in the target in-
creases (kindles). With sufficient time, a critical temperature may be reached at which the
kindling virtual pattern in the target breaches the threshold of observable state, and the
particular pattern observably emerges in the target. The virtual pattern on the bombarding
radiati<?n carrier is then said to have been "kindled" in the target.
This is the manner in which diseases and physiological changes have been induced
in Americans living in the u.s. Embassy in Moscow.
2 7. For extremely significant Soviet work on the transmission of death and disease
patterns from one cell culture to another in a very unusual manner, see V. P. Kaznacheyev
et al, "Distant Intercellular Interactions in a System of Two Tissue Cultures,"
Psychoenergetic Systems, Vol. 1, No. 3, March 1976, pp. 141-142. See also v. P.
Kaznacheyev et al, "Apparent Information Transfer Between Two Groups of Cells,"
Psychoenerqetic Systems, Vol. 1, No.1, December 1974, p. 37. In these e:xperiments
one cell culture is subjected to a lethal mechanism (any sort of lethal mechanism ) • The
exposed sample is on one side of an environmental barrier from a second sample from the
same cell culture. The second (control) sample is not subjected to the lethal agent.
The environmental barrier contains a thin window; if the window is made of glass, the
control sample remains healthy when the test sample is killed. If the window is made
of quartz, the test sample after a time delay will start dying with the same symptoms.
The explanation is as follows: From our model, as the consciousness loop between
a mindworld and a body of a biosystem is kindled into being, the kindling passes through
the first bioframe/hyperframe, the electromagnetic field, breaching the observable state
there, which causes the emission of an ultraviolet mitogenetic photon as seen by '"he lab
observer (zeroth frame, or lab frame). This of course occurs at the birth of an ind.~-vidual
cell, the simplest "bio-organism" considered in this Soviet experiment. As we know in
physics, all interaction occurs by and involves the exchange of virtual particles. Thus
when a cell's body tuning is distorted and damaged so that the consciousness loop to its
mindworld is lost, the collapsing loop reduces back through the first bioframe, which
causes the emission of an anti photon as seen by the lab observer. Since an anti photon is
just a photon {the photon is its own antiparticle), this again is the emission of an
ultraviolet mitogenetic photon. In this case, however, the virtual patterns in the body of
the dying biosystem are carried as modulations on the photon emitted at death.
19.
l]
~
'l
·!