Documents / FOIA release

NRC FOIA-2017-0368 UFO records

The Black Vault · 44 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Black Vault release contains the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's March 23, 2017 response to John Greenewald's FOIA request 2017-0368 for UFO records collected since 1975. The NRC withheld identifying information. The records cover three allegation files. The first is a 2010 Region IV case about a former security officer who said a triangular UFO hovered over the protected area at Cooper Nuclear Station between 1986 and 1989. The other two are a 1997 letter claiming DoD flew nuclear-powered craft from New Mexico and a 1998 California complaint.

p 1 of3age
Branch Evaluation, Plan, & Recommendation
Allegation Number: RIV-201 0-A-01 01
Facility Name: Cooper Nuclear Station
Responsible Oiv: DRS
0Yerall Respona+ble Branch: PSB 1
Received Date
6/13/2010
Purpose of this ARB:
30 Days
7/1312010
Initial ARB
Basis for a Subsequent ARB:
70 Days
8122/2010
Docket/License No: 05000298
ARB Date: 06/29/10
(As .signed by the ARB)
% p_a..t!
9/11/2010
120 Days
10/11/2010
Does the Alleger OBJECT to the NRC requesting that the Yes x , .. 1\to. < N/Alicensee formally assess/evaluate the concem(s)? .· ' ' ..
If any of the following factors apply, this allegation shall not be submitted to the licensee for investigation
or review.
Information cannot be released in sufficient detail to the licensee without compromising the identity of the alleger or
confidential source.
The licensee could compromise an Investigation or inspection because of knowledge gained from the discussions.
The allegation is made against the Ucensee's management or those parties who would normally receive and address the
allegation.
The basis of the allegation is information received from a Federal or State agency that does not approve of the information
being released.
The licensee's allegation trend, quality of response(s), problem identification and resolution, and/or cycle review results are
such that the NRC should independently evaluate the concem(s).
The NRC evaluation would be more timely and efficient- there is an ongoing or upcoming Inspection which could evaluate
theconcem.
Significant public/Commission interest warrants independent assessment of concem(s).
The alleger ha$ taken the concem(s) to the licensee with unsatisfactory results.
r- -\1- .~i:i·.r.- :.:
.' ·w:.····.~_,t{' r_ _, ~ - ,.,. ARB PARTICIPANTS . - • · ·~ :? • j' ::., i ·~~
Chairman:
!"1~~-~
1 :.~ .:;~~t~~::;·
··::f%-{~f;~\·,
L :1;~ I
IChaimian Approval: IDate:
Brief Overall Allegation Summary - if more than 3 Concerns. use keywords. topics. subject. etc.: Provide
a summary or selected keywords/topics/subject for the whole allegation's contents below. *-See the BEPR
Desktop Guide for assistance.
An Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) hovered over the protected area 21 years ago.
I

About this file

FOIA release, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 44 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.