Documents / Official release

Office of the Secretary of Defense: 08_Go_Fast

Department of Defense. Office of the Secretary of Defense. · 2023 · 26 pages · text from the file's own layer

This All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) case resolution from the U.S. Department of Defense is dated February 2025. It covers the "Go Fast" FLIR video, which a U.S. Navy F/A-18F recorded off Florida in January 2015. AARO found the object was at about 13,000 feet and moving between 5 and 92 mph once wind is accounted for. It assesses with high confidence that the object showed no anomalous performance and attributes the apparent high speed to motion parallax. A technical appendix explains the calculations.

UNCLASSIFIED
13
UNCLASSIFIED
= √(4,510 − 4,251)2 + (−4,941 − (−4,890))2 + (3,612 − 3,591)2 (13𝑏)
= √67,081 + 2,601 + 441 = 265 𝑚 (13𝑐)
Dividing this distance by the 13 seconds elapsed between t1 and t2 gave an estimated speed of
about 20 m/s or 45 mph. The heading of the UAP, φUAP, was also calculated from the Δx and Δy
components of the locations.
𝜑𝑈𝐴𝑃 = tan−1 (Δ𝑦
Δ𝑥) = tan−1 ((−4,890 − (−4,941))
(4,251 − 4,510) ) = −11.14° (14)
The UAP heading is forward along the +x-axis and slightly in the negative y direction, moving in
the same general direction as the F/A-18 (-9.6°) but about 9 times slower. As a reminder, all
depicted locations and directions are relative to the defined coordinate system. Referencing
directions such as North, South, East, and West cannot be done without knowledge of the
location or heading of the F/A-18.
Estimating the UAP Path of Travel
The previous sections explained the methodology used to calculate the positions of the UAP at
the two endpoints of the time interval, t1 and t2. The resulting speed and relative heading
assumed the UAP traveled in a mostly straight, direct path between these two points. The same
mathematical approach was then applied to every frame of the thirteen-second video to estimate
the continuous path of the UAP from the first to last points. This calculation required an
estimate of the time, sensor azimuth and elevation, range to target, and the F/A-18 location for
all frames in the period. The metadata did provide relative frame times, with 0.033 seconds
elapsing between frames in the 30 Hz video.
Path of the F/A-18
The F/A-18’s altitude, bank angle, and airspeed remained constant between t1 and t2. Therefore,
the radius of the curvature of its flight path remained constant from (6). The distance traveled at
each point in time was the elapsed frame time multiplied by the speed. Location and yaw were
then calculated using the previously describe methods.
Path of the UAP
The sensor azimuth, sensor elevation, and range to the object were changing during the video.
The sensor’s display indicated these changes in integers so that many frames would pass before a
value was incremented or decremented. More accurate estimates were made by noting the
frames and times when a quantity incremented or decremented. For example, in the frame that a08Page determined to be Unclassified
Reviewed by Chief of Staff, AARO
IAW FY24 NDAA, Section 1841(a)(1)(C)
Date: 2/14/2025

Cases discussed

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 26 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.