197878 [Steven Greer]: 7431993-20060483F-001-004-2023

.. . ' ..
3
Policy makers must not be deceived by these reports, nor should policy making be influenced in
any way by them. Since the data base is hopelessly contaminated by these falsely induced events,
it cannot be relied on as a source of reliable information for policy formulation. We have learned
that a number of researchers in this area have similarly concluded that most (80-90% or more)
of abduction accounts are disinformation, or misidentification of other unusual phenomena.
2. Cattle 'mutilations' : Alleged cattle experiments by ET craft (misnamed 'mutilations' for
disinformation purposes) have been reported since the 1960s. The primary scientists and
researchers in this area have confirmed to us that at least 80% of these cases are actually decoy
cases created by covert operations and have nothing to do with UFO/ETI activity. Our
assessment is that the real cases are understandable environmental and genetic research related
to radiation and chemical pollution and their effect on advanced mammalian systems. We would
seriously doubt a sinister or hostile motive behind these relatively rare actual occurrences, and
feel that the false decoy cases are designed to create disinformation, to conceal the actual cases
and to create an atmosphere of fear around the subject. Policy makers should not be adversely
influenced by these reports, or deceived by them in any way.
Policy makers need to be aware of the potential for advanced technological active disinformation,
both as it affects data bases and as it could potentially be targeted towards policy makers
themselves. We would caution against undue fear in this regard , but do feel that senior policy
makers should be aware of the potential for this type of disinformation and how it could be
directed at them, which include both active and passive targeting.
Simulated ET Events: We have also learned that technologies exist to support the simulation of
false hostile ET events, designed specifically to influence policy makers in a time of crisis, or
to 'spin' any announcement and disclosure process in the direction of uniting the world against
a 'common alien threat' . Military and civilian policy makers must not be deceived by such
events, since the stakes are enormous, and decisions based on such pseudo-UFO events would
likely result in negative actions which would be unwarranted. The vast and profound implications
of our future relations with extraterrestrial civilizations must not be influenced by this type of
disinformation, since it would be designed to place the earth on a path of inter-planetary conflict
· and would subvert the potential for future peaceful and beneficial relations.
In summary, a number of advanced disinformation modalities exist which policy makers need to
take into consideration as they evaluate data or receive briefings from traditionally covert sources.
CSETI and its affiliated scientists and researchers are committed to obtaining reliable data by way
of direct, real time observation of and interaction with the ETI phenomenon. We feel that
empirical research of this type (see Briefing Document Draft) is more useful, accurate and
reliable than other secondary means which are prone to disinformation contamination. Should
you wish to make further inquiries into the CSETI research findings or assessment, please feel
free to contact the Director of CSETI, Steven M. Greer M.D. at 704-274-5671. We are available
to you to provide a confidential on-site briefing regarding this subject if this is desired.
END BRIEFING
@,~~tJ.~J--tD