Documents / Official release

9606505: 7585721-20060527F-001-013-2023

· 13 pages · text from the file's own layer

This file comes from the Clinton Presidential Library's National Security Council records. It holds Presidential Determination No. 96-54, dated September 1996, together with the memoranda that led to it. The determination renews for one year an exemption under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act for the Air Force's operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada. The exemption shields classified information from disclosure during the Kasza v. Browner and Frost v. Perry litigation, which was on appeal, but it does not waive environmental standards.

  • p. 9 …LAKE 1O1O DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-1010 SUBJECT: Classified Information Concerning the Air Force’s…
65051
September 27, 1996
ACTION
MEMORANDUM FOR THE PRESIDENT
THROUGH:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
requirements concerning the inspection and inventory of hazardous
Background
issued an exemption under the ResourceOn September 29, 1995, you issued an exemption under tne Kesour
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) protecting from disclosure
While ruling
Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division concur in
cc: Vice President
Chief of Staff
THE WHITE HOUSE
WASH INGTON
Purpose
To continue to exempt the Air Force from public disclosure
waste*at"the Air Force^"operating location near Groom Lake.
THE EXECUTIVE CLERK
ANTHONY L
Presidential Determination on RCRA Exemption tor
the Operating Location at Groom Lake
this recommendation as does Katie McGinty. As with last year s
exemption, the attached document is worded narrowly, to exempt
the location only from disclosure requirements and not from
applicable environmental standards.
classified information regarding an Air Force facility near Groom
Lake, Nevada. By statute, the exemption is effective for one
year, unless renewed. As a result, the attached exemption should
be signed by September 29. The exemption was necessitated by
litigation over RCRA compliance at the facility.
that the information in question was appropriately classified,
the Federal district court ruled that under RCRA classified
information could only be protected from public disclosure
pursuant to a Presidential exemption.
That ruling is now being appealed, as is plaintiffs' challenge to
the sufficiency of your original exemption. In the interim,
Deputy Secretary of Defense White and Secretary of the Air Force
Widnall recommend that you renew the exemption to provide
continued protection for national security information while the
matter is on appeal. EPA Administrator Browner and Department of

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 13 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.