Documents / Official release
This Clinton Presidential Library file of White House and National Security Council records from January 1996 concerns President Clinton's report to Congress under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. It contains NSC routing sheets, memoranda from James Baker, Anthony Lake, Patrick Griffin and the Deputy Secretary of Defense, and letters to Speaker Newt Gingrich and Senate President Albert Gore. The letters give notice of Presidential Determination 95-45 of September 29, 1995. That determination exempted the Air Force operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada, from waste laws that would require disclosure of classified information.
“The Pentagon”1 page
0475 January 26, 1996 ACTION MEMORANDUM FOR ANTHONY LAKE THROUGH: ALAN KRECZKO V FROM: JAMES SUBJECT: r i(\ J NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON, D.C. 20504 Report to Congress on Presidential Exemption Concerning the Operating Location Near Groom Lake BAKER^, Under RCRA, the President is required to report each January to the Congress all exemptions granted during the previous year and the reasons for doing so. This is the first such report during this Administration. The attached report has been coordinated with the Departments of Defense and Justice as well as the EPA; it should be submitted to Congress no later than January 31. In September the President exempted the Air Force operating location near Groom Lake, Nevada, from any applicable provisions of hazardous or solid waste laws that would require disclosure of classified information. The exemption was granted in the context of litigation (Browner) over the Government's compliance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). As to the status of the litigation, we are doing well. On January 10, the district court determined that the EPA had completed its statutory duties with regard to the inspection and inventory of the operating location, rendering the Browner case moot. The court also ruled that the Government has "complied with RCRA's public disclosure requirements by virtue of the Presidential Determination," and has entered final judgment in the case. In a companion case, Perry, in which you are a named defendant, the court is continuing to consider cross motions for summary judgment. We are optimistic in light of the court's ruling in Browner. Notwithstanding these successes, we will need to consider whether to appeal one aspect of the court's ruling: that in the absence of a Presidential exemption EPA has a nondiscretionary duty under RCRA to disclose classified information.
Not linked to a story yet.
Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 16 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.