Documents / Official release

[01/29/1998 - 10/19/1999]: 24194021-20060474F-001-023-2023

· 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This release contains White House Exchange Mail records dated January 1998 to October 1999. Most of it is a transcript of a January 29, 1998 press briefing by Press Secretary Mike McCurry covering Iraq, Iran, the budget and the Lewinsky inquiry, plus a 1998 presidential speech. An October 19, 1999 email among Transnational Threats staff forwards a Florida Today article on how scientists expect alien contact would spark a media frenzy rather than a cover-up, describing the 1989 SETI detection protocol.

  • p. 47 …with a bipartisan plan that might be harder for any person to do alone And I…
34FE6299.FIN Page 7 of 14
http://classified/email/data_source/exchange/record/cd008/febl998/34fe6299.html 1/5/2010
and I would ask you to ask other people who care about Social Security
reform
about this - but it is their and our concern that were the President or on<
the major leaders to come out with a specific detailed plan prior to the
election, that it carries with it the risk that that would become a source o
political gunfire prior to the election and that that could actually reduce
rather than increase the prospects of Social Security reform.
Q You said that in the past you used the budget surpluses to pay down tl
national debt while you were waiting for a solution on Social Security. I
MR. SPERLING: I'm glad that you asked that because there's been a lot
think confusion maybe on that. Partly that's because this topic of the tru:
fund is certainly a complex one. But let me try to be clear.
right or wrong — but it is our opinion that creating an atmosphere where
there
could be a bipartisan centrist solution to Social Security is the best hope
that happening. And it is our concern and the concern of many, many ot
use it to pay down the national debt, how do you then retrieve the surph
if
you decide you need them to shore up Social Security?
Our position was that nobody should pass legislation that drains the surj
no
one pass legislation that drains or spends the surplus until we know how
much of
the surplus is needed for a comprehensive Social Security plan. Under o
planning, under our prospects, we see that — we don't see a surplus in ar
significant form happening during the time period we are trying to get tl
done.
If our calculation on that were to change at some point, that would chan
our
view. But right now I think the best thing we could do is use this year to
to have the kind of atmosphere we had in '97 in the balanced budget
agreement,
where we I think helped create an atmosphere where we could get togetl
and come
up with a bipartisan plan that might be harder for any person to do alone
And I'd just say we had $400 billion of Medicare savings over 10 years,
don't
believe that if either the Democrats or Republicans had made that their
platform
in '97, that that would have happened. I think what happened is that we
able to work together and come up with that at one time in a way that th
was
significant buy-off.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.