Documents / Official release

[01/29/1998 - 10/19/1999]: 24194021-20060474F-001-023-2023

· 88 pages · text from the file's own layer

This release contains White House Exchange Mail records dated January 1998 to October 1999. Most of it is a transcript of a January 29, 1998 press briefing by Press Secretary Mike McCurry covering Iraq, Iran, the budget and the Lewinsky inquiry, plus a 1998 presidential speech. An October 19, 1999 email among Transnational Threats staff forwards a Florida Today article on how scientists expect alien contact would spark a media frenzy rather than a cover-up, describing the 1989 SETI detection protocol.

  • p. 12 …what ti relationship was between Lewinsky and Betty Currie? MR. MCCURRY: I'm just not going…
  • p. 20 …Q Mike, on the relationship — the question of the relationship between Lewinsky and Betty Currie, can…
Page 11 of 28
w
Q If we agree -
Q She speaks for herself. (Laughter.)
Q It's a deal.
reporting on that subject, but the White House itself has not taken any ft
http://classified/email/data_source/exchange/record/cd008/jan 1998/34edab55 .html 1/5/2010
Q You keep saying that you're constrained. I don't understand what you'
constrained by.
Q Why is the Clinton administration weighing protecting Secret Service
agents
from potentially testifying in this case?
Q Has the President invoked executive privilege in response to any of tl
subpoenas from Mr. Starr?
Q May I just follow? Do you feel that it would compromise their ability
protect the President if they're exposed to this sort of testimony?
position with respect to what position the Treasury or the Secret Service
should
take on that matter. We have always -- and you've heard me before say 1
MR. MCCURRY: I'd have to ask that you direct that question to the Sec
Service. I don't know exactly the reason why. I've seen some reporting I
MR. MCCURRY: I have not heard of any request from the independent
counsel that
MR. MCCURRY: I'm not an expert on that and I think they are in the b<
position to address that.
MR. MCCURRY: Apparently, someone in the White House did
anonymously answer the
question. But I'm not in a position to do it and I will tell you, I do not kr
the answer.
34EDAB55.FIN
deferred to the judgment of those who are professionally responsible foi
protecting the President when they look at the technical and specific
questions
related to what kind of security they provide and what kind of environm
they
need to provide the most effective security.
MR. MCCURRY: Okay, well, David, you asked me that a lot yesterday
I
answered as best I could. I can't do it better than I did yesterday.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 88 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.