Documents / Official release

[UFO] [2]: 7262140-20060474F-001-010-2023

· 345 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a CSETI Project Starlight comprehensive briefing document, prepared by Steven M. Greer, M.D., director of the Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence, and dated April 1997. It contains CSETI position papers arguing that the US government secretly holds extraterrestrial craft and that covert management of the subject threatens national security, along with letters to President Clinton seeking disclosure. It also includes government records, among them an FAA Charlotte Tower re-recording of a December 1977 police helicopter sighting.

  • p. 3 …Letter from Project Starlight Coalition to President Clinton - June 4, 1995 6. National Security Implications of…
  • p. 10 …Project Starlight Coalition. a group of American and international ::itizens working to effect a public disclosure…
  • p. 18 …However, the CSETI Project Starlight disclosure effort is aimed 180 degrees away from such xenophobic concepts…
  • p. 20 …Even the process of coming to grips with the post-disclosure reality of an extraterrestrial presence…
  • p. 21 …That covert human projects have possessed advanced extraterrestrial technologies and have been 'reverse-engineering' them for…
  • p. 24 …advisability of a disclosure. Many compartmentalized operations within 'black' or USAPS projects are structured so that…
  • p. 27 …Imagine being involved with a project unraveling and then applying advanced extraterrestrial technology. The power and…
  • p. 28 …CSETI Project Starlight has been working for nearly 3 years to collect evidence, identify current and…
  • p. 30 …Planned Disclosure on the UFO/Extraterrestrial Subject and National Security Oaths The CSETI (Center for the…
  • p. 31 …We invite your advice, assistance and support in this process of disclosure on a matter which…
  • p. 32 …A number of first hand military, intelligence and government-associated witnesses to covert projects dealing with…
  • p. 34 …Provided that the disclosure process (as conceived by Project Starlight) avoids xenophobic, fear-inducing and militaristic…
  • p. 35 …After that time, the Administration could be harmed by a late, uncontrolled disclosure since such an…
  • p. 38 ' SUMMARY OF POINTS REGARDING PROJECT STARLIGHT FOR THE CLINTON AOMINISTRATION PROJECT STARLIGHT is a program spearheaded…
  • p. 39 …a Failu:-e to effect a change in policy and to provide disclosure on this subject…
  • p. 41 …nor do we recommend, the disclosure of certain valid secret projects which are vital to national…
[ OOOBSA
r--------~.-.-------., . ·1:
14 c. There 1a a possibility that some of the inci~ent.'J ::ay be
1
caused br natural .pbe:noaena, auch a3 meteors.
d. 'lhe reported operatil:g characteristics so.ch as ~reme
rates o! cliab, mnt!1fferability (particular]J' in roll), aDi act!.on which
m.st be ccnsidered en.siTe ll'hen sighted or contacted by fngn~ air-
cra.!t a!'.d radar, lend belief to the pcssibilit7 that some or t :·.e object.a
are c:m"trolled either mar.~, autoz:atic~ or re.:notely-.
e. T~e a pparent co=~ c .:-ecripticn o~ t h<? objects is aa follew3 :-
( l) lJetallic '-':' light :.-eflectir.5 s '.ll'!'ace.
SECHE':
Basic Lt.r t'r CG, J.MC, M' to co, W'1 '1ash. D. C. subj •ill: Opin!.-:,n Con-
cerning •F~g Di.sea•.
(2) Absence or trail, except in a fp instances when the
object apparent~ was operating und~ hig.'l :f,or!or-
mance ccnditions.
(3) Circular or elliptica1 in shape, flat an b~tam. and
domed a::1 top.
(4) Severa1 reports a! -.ell kept f"ormation !'"-ight.s nrJ"1Dg
!rom three to nine object8.
(5) Uarmlly no a.ssociated scu.-x!, except. in t.arc.o instances
• 911bstantia1 ru...bling roar was noted.
( 6) Level !liiht speeds nonr.ally' above 300 kr..Jts are csti-
mted.
r. It is poas!.ble 11:i.thin the prese:1t u. s. k:Dow:l.ed;e - pro-
vided ert.erusiv9 detailed develop::ent :!.s •.mdert.a;c~ - to ccr.struct a
piloted airc~-aft r..ich baa the 69:ia~l descripti~ or the o~;~ct !n sub-
pa!cl~r~~ (e) above which would be capable or an &?;)rad.mate ran,;.? or
7J'JO mihs at su~scni.c speecb.
g. ~ developments ir. this cou."ltr:, alon.: the lines indicated
woul.:i be ~?.le~ expensive, ti.ma co:1.Smdng am at t:ie considera;:ile ex-
pense of current projects and therefore, if' directec!, should be:, .,; up in-
dep-.ndent~ O! existing ~:rojecta.
b. Dae consid~rat.1.on J111St be given the folloiring:-
(l)
(2)
The possibilit,. that these objects are or domestic
origin - the product or some bi.gb securit7 i:roject
not known to JI;/AS-2 or this Commnd.
The lack or pbJsical evidence in t~ ahape of. crash
reccrnred uhibite 1'hich woul.d UDde!li.abl,y prove the
existence o! these objects.
I

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 345 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.