Documents / Official release

[UFO] [2]: 7262140-20060474F-001-010-2023

· 345 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a CSETI Project Starlight comprehensive briefing document, prepared by Steven M. Greer, M.D., director of the Center for the Study of Extraterrestrial Intelligence, and dated April 1997. It contains CSETI position papers arguing that the US government secretly holds extraterrestrial craft and that covert management of the subject threatens national security, along with letters to President Clinton seeking disclosure. It also includes government records, among them an FAA Charlotte Tower re-recording of a December 1977 police helicopter sighting.

  • p. 3 …Letter from Project Starlight Coalition to President Clinton - June 4, 1995 6. National Security Implications of…
  • p. 10 …Project Starlight Coalition. a group of American and international ::itizens working to effect a public disclosure…
  • p. 18 …However, the CSETI Project Starlight disclosure effort is aimed 180 degrees away from such xenophobic concepts…
  • p. 20 …Even the process of coming to grips with the post-disclosure reality of an extraterrestrial presence…
  • p. 21 …That covert human projects have possessed advanced extraterrestrial technologies and have been 'reverse-engineering' them for…
  • p. 24 …advisability of a disclosure. Many compartmentalized operations within 'black' or USAPS projects are structured so that…
  • p. 27 …Imagine being involved with a project unraveling and then applying advanced extraterrestrial technology. The power and…
  • p. 28 …CSETI Project Starlight has been working for nearly 3 years to collect evidence, identify current and…
  • p. 30 …Planned Disclosure on the UFO/Extraterrestrial Subject and National Security Oaths The CSETI (Center for the…
  • p. 31 …We invite your advice, assistance and support in this process of disclosure on a matter which…
  • p. 32 …A number of first hand military, intelligence and government-associated witnesses to covert projects dealing with…
  • p. 34 …Provided that the disclosure process (as conceived by Project Starlight) avoids xenophobic, fear-inducing and militaristic…
  • p. 35 …After that time, the Administration could be harmed by a late, uncontrolled disclosure since such an…
  • p. 38 ' SUMMARY OF POINTS REGARDING PROJECT STARLIGHT FOR THE CLINTON AOMINISTRATION PROJECT STARLIGHT is a program spearheaded…
  • p. 39 …a Failu:-e to effect a change in policy and to provide disclosure on this subject…
  • p. 41 …nor do we recommend, the disclosure of certain valid secret projects which are vital to national…
MEMORANDUM FOR:
SUBJECT
PERTINENT PARTS RETYPED FOR READABILITY
000427
[ blacked out]
21 September 1957
Acting Director , Central Intelligence
Unidentified Flying Objects Reported on
20 September 1957
.,;
1. As reported by components of the US Air Defense Command, an
unidentified flying object (UFO) was tracked by US radars on a
relatively straight course from the eastern tip of Long Island to the
vicinity of Buffalo. The object was reportedly moving westward at an
altitude of 50,000 feet and speed of 2,000 kts. "Jamming" was
reported by several radars in this vicinity and westward as far as
Chicago. In a subsequent briefing for representatives of the IAC,
the US Air Force reported that the original reports had been degraded
somewhat by information that: (a) there was an 11 minute break in
the track; ( b ) weather conditions in the area were of a type which
have in the past produced false radar pips and electronic
interference; (c) B-47's of SAC were in the area near Chicago on an
ECM training flight. The ADC has not completed its investigation of
this incident, but in any event it now seems clear that the phenomena
reported west of Buffalo were not related to the UFO.
2. We have no intelligence on Soviet activities (e.g., long-
range air, submarine , or merchant shipping operations) which can be
related specifically to this reported event. We believe it unlikely
that a Soviet aircraft could conduct a mission at this speed and
altitude and return to Bloc territory. However , we credit the USSR
with the capability to have a submarine-launched cruise-type missile
of low supersonic [illegible] and a range of about 500 n.m., but we
have no specific evidence of the existence of such a missile.
3. We have examined possible Soviet motives for launching a
one-way vehicle on an operation over the US, and consider that there
would be little motivation at this time, except possibly a psycholo-
gical or retaliatory motive, which we believe is marginal. One-way
reconnaissance operations are largely ruled out by the likelihood
that the results would be of small value, and the risk of compromise
would be very great.

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 345 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.