Documents / Official release

Scanned: Case Number 243544: 42-t-1127712-20060476F-001-001-2013

· 47 pages · text from the file's own layer

This file, released by the William J. Clinton Presidential Library under FOIA request 2006-0476-F, holds White House correspondence records for case 243544. In a July 8, 1997 letter to President Clinton, Kent Jeffrey of the International Roswell Initiative submitted more than 20,000 signed copies of the Roswell Declaration, which asks for an Executive Order declassifying UFO information. On December 9, 1997 the Air Force replied that such an order was unnecessary because declassification under E.O. 12958 was already underway.

  • p. 25 …David Spencer .......... ·.··S~c(mdclilsS postage paid illSegilill; TX. ..•....•.....•......... ...•. .• . . ART DIRECTOR .•. •. ···.....P6StMAST£R:Sclldjorm~579ioiliviSech(lngeof…
MUFON UFO JOURNAL
Prometheus
Books, 1997,
he, 264 pp.,
iIIus., $26.95
ISBN 1-57392
127-0
June
Number 350
Page 18
Reviewed by Karl T. Pflock
ThiS book is like the Roswell case itself.
There's a lot less here than meets the eye.
Much is promised, little is delivered. No matter
where the reader may stand with respect to the
facts and truth of Roswell, disappointment and
frustration is inevitable with this quickie cut-and
paste job, rushed into print by the de facto book
publishing arm of the Committee for the
Scientific Investigation of Claims of the
Paranormal (CSICOP) to capitalize on the 50th
anniversary of the Roswell non-crash/retrieval
and push CSICOP's line that UFOs can't be,
therefore they aren't. .
At the outset, Korff correctly observes, "The
Roswell incident, and all that surrounds it, is a
complex web of events, not easily understand
able nor explainable until examined fully and in
painstaking detail." He then proceeds to skip
across the surface of the murky Roswell waters
like one of Kenneth Arnold's saucers, with the
all important details left submerged in the depths
and few pains taken.
The same is true of his editors. The book is
riddled with typographical errors, bad grammar
and usage, easily caught factual errors, etc. It is a
slap-dash job by all concerned, and tells us more
about CSICOP's agenda than it does about
Roswell.
The publisher's jacket blurb declares Korff s
work "a ground-breaking investigation that fi
nally determines the real truth [as opposed to the
"unreal truth"?] behind the Roswell mystery." In
fact, while Korff brings some interesting tidbits
to light, all the important ground was broken and
well plowed some years ago-principally by
Robert Todd, Prof. C. B. Moore, Capt. James
McAndrew, and, yes, myself. The fundamental
elements of the "real truth" have been publicly
known since June 1994, revealed in detail in my
Roswell in Perspective (RiP). These were mas
sively supplemented by The Roswell Report:
Fact vs. Fiction in the New Mexico Desert, pub
lished in 1995 by a reluctant Air Force goaded
into action by New Mexico Congressman Steve
Schiff. In the intervening years, Robert Todd, I,
and others independently have provided further
elaboration, clarification, and correction in occa
sional articles, papers, and letters of comment in
UFO journals, on the Internet, and even in CSI-
COP's own magazine, the Skeptical Inquirer.
Hey, CSICOP: Been there, done that!
Although we are told this volume culminates
16 years' research, of the book's more than 350
notes to text, only a few suggest any original in
vestigation by the author, and most of these cite
telephone interviews conducted in the fall of
1996. The rest show us where Korff did the
lion's share of his "painstaking" research: in the
pages of other books about Roswell. Tellingly,
. some of these notes give the reader a bum
steer-as for example, citing my RiP as the
source of this intriguing quote attributed to
Roswell researcher Kevin Randle: "If I had to
rely on the public record [in the Roswell case],
I'd throw up. The evidence is not strong and it's
not compelling."
. Large chunks of text are pages-long extracts
of others' words and findings, notably Todd's,
and nearly 10 percent of the book is given over
to an appendix, "The Roswell Incident and the
NYU Balloon Project," lifted from the Air
Force's RosweliReport (from which Korff also
cribbed most of his illustrations). The lengthy
bibliography is larded with references having no
bearing on the case at hand and, oddly, does not
include my RiP, the only skeptical look at
Roswell written by what Korffs CSICOP pa
trons call a pro-UFOlogist and from which Korff
lifts a line out of context and uses it to misrepre
sent my views on what actually "crashed" at
Roswell (see Korff, p. 227, and Pflock, pp. 113
117, especially p. 116). While Korff says and I
believe this was inadvertent. it tells us something
of the rigor of his research.
One of the enticements Korff and his pub
lisher dangle before the unsuspecting is the
promise of "information never before pub
lished-military records, formerly classified pro
jects, and correspondence-revelations powerful
enough to change public opinion forever." It
turns out the book contains but six examples of
such, none of the earth-shattering significance
touted in the foregOing hype. Briefly, they are:
(I) Lydia Sleppy worked at Albuquerque's
Radio KOAT in early July 1947, when she says
she received a call from the late Johnny
McBoyle, station manager of a KOAT affiliate in
Roswell. As Sleppy tried to send McBoyle's
"scoop" about a crashed flying saucer over a
news wire, she claims. the "receive" bell on her
Teletype began ringing, and a "stop transmitting"
message from the FBI was printed automatically.
Korff was advised by the FBI that it did not
have such an intercept capability in New Mexico
in July 1947 and had no record of such an inci
dent. Moreover, the Bureau said the Teletype1997

Cases discussed

  • Roswell Incident 1947
    Roswell Declaration on 1947 recovery at Roswell Army Air Field, weather balloon cover story

About this file

Official release, from the nara collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 47 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.