Documents / Document

MOD file DEFE 24/2032/1

The Black Vault · 492 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Ministry of Defence file, released through The National Archives and published by The Black Vault, holds the MOD's 2002 handling of Dr David Clarke's requests for UFO documents under the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information. It includes the MOD's 9 December 2002 reply, which covered reports from 1976, 1980, 1993 and 1996 and charged £260. It also contains internal emails and file requisitions, plus Foreign Office and United Nations papers from 1978 on Grenada's proposal for UFO research.

  • p. 40 …But, unlike with the aircraft reported by the noble Earl, I have never seen one. I…
  • p. 43 …the United States of America which has never been made known to the public and even…
  • p. 45 …will be, Yes, and yet they have never seen one. We are asking you to believe…
  • p. 46 …selfish- ness and tendency to panic as never before since the days of the Crusades. The…
  • p. 47 …I never reached that standard of mathematics. However I know that Einstein believed that ele~tro…
  • p. 51 …The difficulty about such an explanation is that they never seem to come into actual contact…
  • p. 53 …some of the things he told us. Never- theless, I feel that it is of immense…
  • p. 58 …What sort of an interpretation would somebody who had H.L.8 Q never read about…
  • p. 59 …l should lib:1 have never seen ball lightning, but the 1 to go into the…
  • p. 60 …She said "I don't \Vant to, because it will spoil it all." They said " Never…
  • p. 62 …Of ;orts of sightings ~never it has been n·estigation they tttral phenomena pet to say…
  • p. 67 …1308 fro,m h;m ag~;n ~n many other occ";?"'· ' Why have they never tded…
  • p. 112 ..~ say that in the Air Force, for tne moment, they have never seemed to come directly…
  • p. 131 …informed that 11so far the military have never fonnd an-ything of D.nt1tjgressive nature fro…
  • p. 161 …Air Force, for tile moment, they have never seemed to come directly under air defence. ' . I…
  • p. 177 …informed that 11so far the military have never found anything of an~~gressive nature from the…
  • p. 187 …But it would be a brave man who said there could never, ever,be manned inter…
  • p. 190 …a cloud descended and picked up ~he regiment and it was never heard of again ••••••• (checking…
  • p. 192 …Let me assure this House that Her Majesty's Government has never been approached by people…
  • p. 209 …But it would be a brave man who said there could never, ever,be manned inter…
  • p. 212 …a cl6ud descended and picked up :the regiment and it was never heard of again ••••••• (checking…
  • p. 214 …Let me assure this Rouse that Her Majesty's Government has never been approached by people…
  • p. 300 …despite agreeing to complete a report form, this has never been returned - I wonder why? (13)
  • p. 320 …Mrllllllll stated that he had been a Met Officer for 8 years and had never~nything…
  • p. 368 …despite agreeing to complete a report form, this has never been returned - I wonder why? (13)
  • p. 399 …Significantly, the plot was never present on radar displays from the NATS sensors at Cromer and…
  • p. 417 …RAF Northwood was never involved in this event. confusion has arisen because Gt Yarmouth coastguard, referred…
  • p. 432 …Significantly, the plot was never present on radar displays from the NATS sensors at Cromer and…
/ f .. ·"'r(
LOOSE MINUTE
D/DA0/1/13
/3 Nov 96
Sec(AS)2a1
Copy to: AOAD1
LETTER TO SOFS FROM MR MARTIN REDMOND MP CONCERNING ALLEGED
'UNIDENTIFIED FLYING CRAFT SIGHTINGS' ON 5 OCT
Reference: Mr Redmond's letter to SofS dated 24 Oct 96.
1. At Reference, Mr Martin Redmond MP raises several points
concerning visual and radar observations which occurred during the
early hours of Saturday 5 Oct 96 and which are referred to,
incorrectly, as 'a visual unidentified flying craft sighting which
was correlated by various different military radar systems'. The
substance of Mr Redmond's letter is based on various reports which
appeared in the local press, some incorrect, ill-informe~dor
tive, which I understand were provided to him by
the staffordshire UFO Group. In addition, the le er
serious criticism of the Service, and of the UK Air
Defence system in particular; for this reason, exceptionally, the
facts surrounding the incident have been established in
considerable detail and set out below, together with resumes of
observations, actions and explanations. A map showing the location
of key agencies, equipment and observations is at Annex A.
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
2. Initial Observations. At approximately 0205Z on 5 Oct 96 a
Skegness police officer on mobile patrol at nearby Addlethorpe
observed stationary multicoloured lights to the east and low in
the sky which he reported to the control room in Skegness. As a
precaution, the control room relayed the sighting to Great
Yarmouth Coastguard Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC),
suspecting it could be related to an incident at sea. The MRCC,
unaware of any maritime activity, asked the Air Rescue
Coordination centre (ARCC) at RAF Kinless whether they were aware
of any air activity or incident in the wash area. The ARCC had no
knowledge of any such air activity and, in turn, asked the Control
and Reporting Centre (CRC) at RAF Neatishead if any aircraft
activity was present on the radar in that area; Neatishead had no
unidentified radar contact on the air defence radars being used to
provide air surveillance in the area and ARCC subsequently asked
the Distress and Diversion (D&D}, located at the London Air
Traffic Control Centre (LATCC) West Drayton (not at RAF Northwood
as the Coastguard erroneously assumed and the press subsequently
reported). The D&D Cell reported a radar plot on the National Air
Traffic Services Claxby radar over Boston to ARCC, thence to MRCC.
At the same time, CRC Neatishead, which had conducted a search on

Cases discussed

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 492 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.