Documents / Document
This Ministry of Defence file, released through The National Archives and published by The Black Vault, holds the MOD's 2002 handling of Dr David Clarke's requests for UFO documents under the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information. It includes the MOD's 9 December 2002 reply, which covered reports from 1976, 1980, 1993 and 1996 and charged £260. It also contains internal emails and file requisitions, plus Foreign Office and United Nations papers from 1978 on Grenada's proposal for UFO research.
“King”18 pages
,, . Written months to learn how to avo· e dangers iof using it within a ing or smoke- filled building. T e considerations. st.ill hold good. - T e are, however, specmhst RN and F firemen, equipped with breathi apparatus and fully trained to use · , who have been deployed in the jor conurbations. UFO's: FRENCH RADIO BROADCAST The EARL of CLANCARTY asked Her Majesty's Government: Whether they will reconsider their decision, implicit in their answers to two recer.t Questions for Written Answer (cots. 1347 and 1453), not to draw the attention of the Ministry of Defence and the Home Office to the interview on France-Inter radio in February 1974 of the then French Minister of Defence M. Robert Galley about unidentified flying objects by M. Jean-Claude Bourret which is transcribed in his book The Crack in the Universe. Lord WINTERBOTTOM: The Mini- stry of Defence are endeavouring to obtain an official transcript of the interview said to have taken place on France-Inter radio in February 1974. GENEVA CONVENTIONS: ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL Lord BROCKWAY asked Her Government: Whether the Governme t have yet decided whether to sign e two addi- tional protocols to th Geneva Con- vent;ons of 1949 whi were adopted at the Humanitaria Law Conference in June of this year· and if he will make a Statement. Lord GORO Y-ROBERTS: The two protocols "" re opened for signature on 12th Dec nber 1977. Protocol I relates to th protection of victims of internationa armed conflicts and Proto- col n to t protection of victims of non- internatio al armed conflicts. Signature of both rotocols on behalf of the United Kingd took place on 12th December. Th Government consider that, overall, the .. '~~ protocols E1ath.. a ·.. ~lu'"~.o:~ '-i.JVi.llh.:~ in _umanitarian law applicable in armed conflicts. In Protocol I we particularly Answers welcome the increased protection for e sick and wounded and for medical aircr. ft; the improved arrangements for i for- mation on persons reported missin ; the protection of the civilian pop ation against direct attack, and the n pro- visions on implementation and nforce- ment both of the protocol and th Geneva Conventions. Protocol 11 pro ides the minimum standards of cond ct to be observed by both sides in ci il wars, a field previously covered only y a single Article in each of the four 49 Geneva Conventions. We welcom the funda mental guarantees provided y Protocol II, in relation to e.g. accused and detained persons, protection of the wounded and sick and medical personnc and protection of the civilian population The United Kingdo 's signature of the protocols was acco panied by formal declarations on variou points, of which copies have been pia d in the Library of the House. Almos without exception, these reflect statem ts made by the United Kingdom at t e Conference which are already part of the negotiating history. The most significant of them concern the scope f application of the protocols. First, s with several recent international con entions, the Govern- ment have cons· ered it necessary to reserve the right t to apply the protocols in relation to S uthern Rhodesia unless and until they a e in a position to ensure that the obliga ions of the protocols in respect of th territory can be fully implemented. Secondly, we have con- firmed the un erstanding upon which we took part in t e negotiations, that the new rules introd ed by Protocol I were not intended to ave any effect on and did not regulate or prohibit the use of nuclear weapons. Thirdly the provisions of Protocol I, including that on prisoner of war status for irre ular fighters, apply only to internati nal armed conflict, which are now so defined by the protocol as to include ertain self-determination conflicts. The overnment have considered it desira le in this connection to place form lly on record by means of an inter retative declaration their under- stan ing of the meaning of the term "a ed conflict", which implies a high 1~\ l ur LlL~:il;)ii.j vl" ,;·~.::i~~i.(y· up~ratiOilS, an their understanding of the require- ments to be fulfiHed by any national i ! I t. ~
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 492 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.