Documents / Document
This FAA Alaskan Region compilation, released through the National Archives and The Black Vault, collects the media inquiries about the November 17, 1986 sighting reported by the crew of Japan Air Lines Flight 1628 over Alaska. It includes call logs, a tally of newspaper articles, a public affairs management report citing 101 inquiries, and press releases. The FAA's March 5, 1987 release concluded that the second radar target was a split return from the JAL Boeing 747 and said no further investigation was planned.
U.S.Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration FOR RE LEASE ON MA RCH 5 , 1987 #87-09 News:Office of Public Affairs Alaskan Region 701 C Street. Box 14 Anchorage, Alaska 995 13 (907) 271-5296 CONTACT: PAUL STEUCKE FAA RELEASES DOCUMENTS ON REPORTED UFO SIGHfING LAST NOVEMBER The Federal Aviation Administration today released documents relating to the reported sighting of an unidentified flying object (UFO) over Alaska by a Japan Air Lines flight crew on November 17, 1986, saying it was unable to confirm the event. The material was issued by FAA's Regional Office in Anchorage, Alaska, and included transcripts of pilot-controller communications, interviews with controllers and the fli ght crew, radar plots and other data. FAA's Regional Public Affairs Officer Paul Steucke pointed out that FAA normally does not investigate UFO sightings but pursued the JAL incident in its r ole as the operator of the air traffic control system. He said the agency's objective was to determine if t here was an unreported aircraft in the vicinity of t he JAL fli ght that could present a safety hazard. As part of the inquiry, Steucke said, radar data of the JAL fli ght track was reviewed by FAA experts at the agency's Technical Center in Atlantic City, N.J., using identical equipment . They determined that a second radar target near the JAL flight at the time of the reported sighting was not another air craft but rather a split radar return from the JAL Boeing 747. Technically, this is known as an "uncorrelated primary and beacon target r eturn." It means that the primary radar signal reflected off the aircraft 's su r face did not correlate exactly with the pulse emitted by the aircraft's r adar beacon transponder. This phenomenon is not unusual and gives the impression of two separate radar targets. Steucke also noted that FAA controllers who monitored the JAL aircraft said i n t heir statements that they thought there might have been another aircraft because of t he dual radar targets. However, a northbound United Air Lines jet that was diverted by controllers to intercept the JAL fli ght path did establish vi sual contact with t hat aircraft but the pilots saw nothing else. The Nov. 17 UFO sighting was reported by JAL Captain Kenjyu Terauchi on a cargo fli ght over the polar cap from Iceland to Japan via Anchorage . Captain Ter auchi said he had visual contact from approximately the U.S.-Canadian border to south of Fairbanks. On Jan. 11, 1987, Captain Terauchi also reported another s i ghtin g in the s ame gene ral area as the first. Steucke sa id FAA is satisfied that the safety of the air traffic control system was not compromised by the Nov. 17 incident and plans no further i nvestigat ion of the circumstances. II II II /
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 44 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.