Documents / Document

Kean v. NASA, 1:03-cv-02509

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (govinfo) · 21 pages · text from the file's own layer

This memorandum opinion by U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, dated March 27, 2007, rules in Leslie Kean's FOIA suit against NASA over records about the object said to have crashed in Kecksburg, Pennsylvania on December 9, 1965. The court found NASA had not shown its searches were adequate and noted likely overlooked Cosmos 96 records. It upheld NASA's withholding of two emails under Exemption 5 and ordered the parties to propose new search procedures.

  • p. 6 …Initially, plaintiff argued that defendant had provided no declarations describing the search efforts at NASA Headquarters…
  • p. 7 …As Margaret Roberts did, McConnell sent out instructions to the various departments at NASA Headquarters using…
  • p. 8 8 In addition to the distributed searches at the NASA Headquarters and Centers, nineteen boxes of…
  • p. 13 …searches distributed across many offices in NASA Headquarters and the NASA Centers. Roberts and McConnell initiated…
  • p. 14 …not find any records on file at Headquarters documenting the 11 items asked for in the…
17
amended since 2000. See Pl.’s Opp. at 49-50. Plaintiff argues
that it is very likely that NASA has some underlying data
regarding this satellite and that NASA’s searches should have
uncovered this data as the FOIA request encompassed information
about the Cosmos 96 satellite. Given the fact that NASA recently
amended one of these documents, see Pl.’s Exs. 10D, 28, it
appears likely that there are responsive documents regarding the
satellite. See Friends of Blackwater v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior,
391 F. Supp. 2d 115, 120-21 (D.D.C. 2005) (holding that absence
of drafts of documents was inconceivable, which was proof that
agency search was inadequate). Second, the fact that the renewed
search of the sixteen Records Center boxes during the fourth
search uncovered responsive documents is evidence that the search
procedures used during the third search were inadequate.
Therefore, because the record as a whole leaves significant doubt
about the adequacy of NASA’s searches, and there were well-
defined FOIA requests and positive indications of overlooked
materials, summary judgment for the defendant is inappropriate.
See Valencia-Lucena, 180 F.3d at 326.
II. Validity of NASA’s Claimed FOIA Exemptions
FOIA requires that federal agencies release all documents
requested by members of the public unless the information
contained within such documents falls within one of nine
exemptions. 5 U.S.C. § 522(a),(b). These statutory exemptions
Case 1:03-cv-02509-EGS Document 45 Filed 03/27/07 Page 17 of 21

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 21 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.