Documents / Document

James A. McDivitt oral history (Doug Ward)

NASA Johnson Space Center · 1999-06-29 · 110 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a NASA Johnson Space Center Oral History Project transcript of astronaut James A. McDivitt, interviewed by Doug Ward at Elk Lake, Michigan, on 29 June 1999. McDivitt talks about flying F-86s in Korea, test pilot work at Edwards, and his first class at the Aerospace Research Pilot School. He also covers turning down Dyna-soar, joining NASA in 1962 and learning to be an Apollo Program Manager. He describes the Change Board and says decisions were not second-guessed.

  • p. 6 …t a definition of the roles and missions of all the different military services and NASA…
  • p. 29 …control, there was no doubt in my mind what my decision would have been. The Mission…
  • p. 37 …There wasn’t anybody in that Mission Control Center who knew anything about it, so there…
  • p. 40 …Your flight—your Gemini IV mission—was also the first flight where Mission Control was located…
  • p. 61 …But sometimes they just got out of control. WARD: Getting back to the effects of the…
  • p. 68 …We made very few changes to it for the original missions. We made a lot
  • p. 69 …McDivitt 29 June 1999 12-69 of changes to it later on for the longer mission…
  • p. 90 …And nobody was getting this live feed of us possibly losing an Apollo mission. And when…
  • p. 91 …One of which was to allow the reporters in Mission Control with access to the flight…
Johnson Space Center Oral History Project James A. McDivitt
29 June 1999 12-27
rules. So, you don’t have to worry, you know, if you can’t light the engine, don’t drop the
spacecraft kind of thing. Or if you drop the spacecraft and you can’t light the engine, you’ve
got to have a rule. What are you going to do? Well, you’ve got to land underneath you or
some simple thing like that.
Well, as we got into Mercury, it was more complex. We got into Gemini, and that
was more complex. We got into Apollo, it was very, very complex. So, the Mission Rules
towards the end were rather comprehensive. But we lived by those Mission Rules. There
were a lot of times when I was a Program Manager that we were—we came up against things
where we had debated that Mission Rule many, many times and that was the Rule. And
that’s what we were going to go by. So, if this thing broke then we’re going to have to do
this. If the other thing broke, we were going to do that. And we weren’t going to deviate
from that in real time because we’d already fought through, carefully, in the, you know—in a
more relaxed manner what—the consequences of all these other alternatives would be.
WARD: Mission Rules really sort of form the basis then for simulation and flight training,
don’t they?
MCDIVITT: Yes and no. Actually it could be said the other way. Flight training and
simulation form the basis for the Mission Rules. I think it was a fluke. You could have a
Mission Rule. You’re getting into training, and you find out one day you simulate that thing
that, that Mission Rule is wrong; you change it in the simulation. You don’t change it in
flight, but you change it in simulation. And that’s why once those Rules were pretty much
set, you didn’t want to change them in flight because a lot of these consequences weren’t
obvious to the casual observer. You know, you had to be there and see what would happen.

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 110 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.