Documents / Document

James A. McDivitt oral history (Doug Ward)

NASA Johnson Space Center · 1999-06-29 · 110 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is a NASA Johnson Space Center Oral History Project transcript of astronaut James A. McDivitt, interviewed by Doug Ward at Elk Lake, Michigan, on 29 June 1999. McDivitt talks about flying F-86s in Korea, test pilot work at Edwards, and his first class at the Aerospace Research Pilot School. He also covers turning down Dyna-soar, joining NASA in 1962 and learning to be an Apollo Program Manager. He describes the Change Board and says decisions were not second-guessed.

Johnson Space Center Oral History Project James A. McDivitt
29 June 1999 12-18
MCDIVITT: Yeah. Yeah.
WARD: I think if I remember the statistic on that one. It’s 1 in 4 loss rate.
MCDIVITT: Yeah. As a matter of fact, the airplanes they got killed in were all T-38s, which
is a pretty reliable airplane. But that’s what flying’s about!
WARD: Well, I recall after each one of those accidents, there seemed to be a hue and cry
from the press and from members of Congress saying, “These things are just too dangerous.
We can’t afford risking these highly trained, experienced people. And we need—” And then
there would be a study and a look at whether we really needed high-performance aircraft as
part of the training.
MCDIVITT: I’m trying to remember how that went. When I joined NASA, we had some
terrible airplanes. We had a couple of TF-102s, which are side-by-side 102s. The F-102 was
a single-seat interceptor; and a TF-102 was a very—it was a difficult airplane. Well, it
wasn’t difficult to fly. But it was a weird airplane in that they—most training airplanes for
fighters are tandem cockpits. You’re like this [gestures]. For this airplane, they decided to
make them this way [gestures]. And so, the fuselage sort of bulged out there; and the flying
characteristics of the TF-102 were kind of weird. And if you flew it alone, you flew it—you
were obviously in one side of the airplane; you couldn’t see out the other side very well. It
had poor performance compared to the regular F-102; and it wasn’t a very good airplane.
The T-33s were all very old and—but, you know, they served a purpose. They were
reliable and all that, but they didn’t have good performance. And so, it was nice to pick up
the T-38s. As a matter of fact, I went and got the first one. I’d been on a T-38 test flight run

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 110 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.