Documents / Hearing transcript

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparency (hearing transcript)

U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2023-07-26 · 54 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is the printed transcript of a July 26, 2023 hearing before the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability's Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs, chaired by Rep. Glenn Grothman. Ryan Graves, David Grusch and retired Navy Commander David Fravor testified on unidentified anomalous phenomena. Members pressed for transparency, whistleblower protection and better pilot reporting. Graves described a near mid-air collision with a dark cube inside a clear sphere off the Eastern Seaboard.

  • p. 3 …David Grusch, Former National Reconnaissance Office Representative, Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force, Department of Defense Oral…
  • p. 15 …as well as reporting to the UAP Task Force—UAPTF—and eventually, once it was established…
  • p. 16 …In 2019, the UAP Task Force Director asked me to identify all special access programs and…
  • p. 36 …Grusch, you sat on the unidentified anomalous phenomenon task force created in the 2020 NDAA, correct…
  • p. 39 …Yes, I am familiar with the UAP Task Force 2019 Security Classification guide. I think it…
33
But IR&D is literally internal to the contractors. So, as long as
it is money, either profits, private investment, et cetera, they do
whatever they want.
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. And to put a finer point on it, when there
is a requirement for any agency or company to—or any agency to
notify Congress, do they contact the chairman of a committee? Do
they get them on the phone specifically? Is this through an email
to, hypothetically, a dead email box?
Mr. GRUSCH. A lot of it comes through what they call the PPR—
Periodic Program Review process—if it is, you know, a SAP or con-
trolled access program equity, and then those go to the specific
committees, whether it be the SASC, HASC——
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. OK. Thank you. I apologize. I just—my time
is limited.
Mr. Graves, one of your main concerns that the FAA currently
does not have an official process to receive reports of UAP from pi-
lots or others, correct?
Mr. GRAVES. Correct.
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. And in your experience what data should
the AARO program prioritize for potential collection? We have, you
know, location, date, time, but are there other specific characteris-
tics that should be included in these reports?
Mr. GRAVES. Certainly. I think that there is two categories that
would be important. One would be kinematics and understanding
the specifics of how the vehicle or objects are moving, and the sec-
ond would be a more zoomed out approach of being able to look at
origin and destination after or before the incident as well as getting
a better contextual understanding of how these objects are inter-
acting with each other.
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. Thank you. Now, because I only have a
minute left—I apologize we only have 5 minutes today. But for the
record, if you were me where would you look? Titles, programs, de-
partments, regions—if you could just name anything. And I put
that as an open question to the three of you.
Mr. GRUSCH. I would be happy to give you that in a closed envi-
ronment. I can tell you specifically.
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. Thank you. Commander Fravor?
Commander FRAVOR. I would say and I have told people that you
have to know where to look. They are not going to divulge it to you
because of the classification levels. But if you know where to look
and who to talk to, which is exactly where Mr. Grusch can point
you then you have them.
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. OK. Mr. Graves?
Mr. GRAVES. I was an operator, so I was depending on folks like
Mr. Grusch to do that homework.
Ms. OCASIO-CORTEZ. OK. Thank you very much. I yield back to
the Chair.
Mr. GROTHMAN. Mr. Biggs?
Mr. BIGGS. Thanks. Thanks, Mr. Chairman. I thank the wit-
nesses for being here today. I am over here.
Thank you so much for being here. I want to get into the spe-
cifics here and the reason I am going to go this way is because you
have talked a bit about what I would call misdirection by official

Cases discussed

About this file

Hearing transcript, from the hearings collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 54 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.