Documents / Hearing transcript
This is an excerpt from the record of the April 5, 1966 House Armed Services Committee hearing on UFOs, which the Internet Archive holds. It includes correspondence about the September 3, 1965 Exeter, New Hampshire sighting involving Raymond E. Fowler, Project Blue Book and the Exeter police officers, plus a letter on the matter from Minority Leader Ford. Dr. J. Allen Hynek, Major Hector Quintanilla and Secretary Harold Brown testify. They say the police officers' observation remains unidentified and that no radar data or jet scrambles were involved.
6040 of September 3, 1965. In other words, both Patrolman Hunt and myself saw this object at close range, checked it out with each other, confirmed and re- confirmed the fact that this was not any kind of conventional aircraft, that it was at an altutude of not more than a couple of hundred feet, and went to con- siderable trouble to confirm that the weather was clear, there was no wind, no chance of weather inversion, and that what we were seeing was no illusion or military or civilian craft. We entered this in a complete official police report as a supplement to the blotter of the morning of September 3 (hot September 2, as your letter indicates). Since our job depends on accuracy and an ability to tell the difference between fact and fiction, we were naturally disturbed by the Pentagon report which attributed the sighting to "multiple high-altituide objects" in the area and "weather inversion." What is a little difficult to under- stand is the fact that your letter (undated) arrived considerably after the Pentagon release. Since your letter says that you are still in the process of making a final evaluation, it seems that there Is an inconsistency here. Ordl. narily, this wouldn't be too important except for the fact that in a situation like this we are naturally very reluctant to be considered irresponsible in our official report to the police station. Since one of us (Patrolman Bertrand) was in the Air Force for 4 years en- gaged in refueling operations with all kinds of military aircraft, it was Im- possible to mistake what we saw for any kind of military operation, regardless of altitude. It was also definitely not a helicopter or balloon. Immediately after the object disappeared, we did see what probably was a B-47 at high altitu-de, but it bore no relation at all to the object we saw. Another fact is that the time of our observation was nearly an hour after 2 a.m., which would eliminate the 8th Air Force operation, Big Blast, since as you say this took place between midnight and 2 a.m. Norman Muscarello, who first reported this object before we went to the sight saw it somewhere in the vicinity of 2 a.m., but nearly an hour had passed before he got into the police station, and we went out to the location with him. We would both appreciate" it very much If you would help us eliminate the possible conclusion that some people have made in that we might have (a) made up the story, or (b) were Incompetent observers. Anything you could do along this line would be very much appreciated, and I'm sure you can under- stand the position we're in. We appreciate the problems the Air Force must have with a lot of irresponsible reports on this subject, and don't want to cause you any unnecessary trouble. On the other hand, we think you probably understand our position. Thanks very much for your interest. Sincerely, EUGENE BERTRAND, Patrolman. DAVID HuNi, Patrolman. DEPARTMENT OF THE Ani FORCE, HEADQUARTERS, 8nr AIR FORcE (SAO), We.tover Air ForceBae,Mass., Noevembr 24,1965. Memorondum :DOOTO. Subject: UFO sighting. To: AFSO (TD9W/UFO.) 1. In reply to your letter, same subject, November 16, 1965, and telephone con- versation between Specialist Master Sergeant Heffiey, 8th Air Force, and Sergant Moody, Headquarters, AFSO, on November 19, 1965, the following Information is furnished. 2. Big Blast "Coeo," a SAC/NORAD training mission, was flown on September 2-3, 1905, By 03/0430Z, the operational portion of the mission was complete, and participating aircraft were en route to their home stations. 1 3. Ten B-47 aircraft from Pease AFB were involved in Big Blast "Coco" and were estimated to arrive attheir initial approach fix (Pease TAGAN 320* radial, 10 DME fix), between 03/0444Z and 03/0535Z. The town of Exeter Is within the traffic pattern utilized by air traffic control in the recovery of these aircraft at Pease AFB, N.H. During their approach the recovering aircraft would have been displaying standard position lights, anticollision lights, and possibly over wing and landinilights. For the commander. WIUJAM A. MOGILPIN, Jr., L~eutenont Colonel, U.S. Air Foroe., Directorateof Operations.
Hearing transcript, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 37 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.