Documents / Document
This Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library file holds 1966 press releases on UFOs from House Minority Leader Gerald R. Ford. In a March 28, 1966 letter, Ford asks the House Armed Services and Science and Astronautics Committees to hold hearings, calling the Air Force's swamp gas explanation of the Michigan sightings flippant. In April statements, Ford says the Air Force has agreed to a university study. The file also contains the October 7, 1966 Air Force announcement choosing the University of Colorado, with Dr. Edward U. Condon as director.
c 0 p y March 28, 1966 Rep. George P. Miller, Cha~rma~ Science and Astronautics Committee. U, s. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. R¢p. L. Mendel Rivers, Chairman Armed Services Committee ·u. s. House of Representatives Washington, D. c. Dear Chairmen Miller and Rivers: ~ ...... . ~ ... '- \ No doubt yo.u have not~d the rec~.t fl)lrry of newspaper stories about unidentified flying objects (UFO' s). I have taken special interest in these accounts because many of the latest reported sighting& have been in my home state of·Michtgan • . . . The Air Force sent a c;o~s,ultant, astrophysicist Dr. J~ Allen Hynek of Northwestern University, to Michigan to investigate the :various r·eports; and he dismissed all of. them as the 'product of college-student pranks or sw8D1p gas or an impr,es_sion created by the rising crescent moon and the planet Venus. I do not agree that all of these reports can be or should be so easily explained away. Because I think.tberell,18y be substance to ~ome of these reports and because I believe tbe ~erican people are entitled to a more thorough explanation than has been given them by the Air Force to date, I am proposing that either the Science and Astronautics Committee or the Armed Services Committee of the House schedule hearings on the subject of UFO's and invite testimony from both the executive branch of the government and some of the persons who claim to have seen UFO's. I enclose material which I think will be helpful to you in assessing the advisability of an investigation of UFO's. May I first call to your attention a column by Roscoe Drummond, published last Sunday in which Mr. Drutm11ond says, "Maybe all of these reported sightings are whimsical, imaginary or unreal; but we need a more credible and detached appraisal of the evidence than we are getting." Mr. Drummond goes on to state, "We need to get all the data drawn together to one place and examined far more objectively than anyone has done so far. A stable public opinion will come from a trustworthy look at the evidence, not from belittling it." "The time has come for the President or Congress to n8Dle an objective and respected panel to investigate, appraise, and report on all present and future evidence about what is going on." I agree fully with Mr. Drummond's statements. I also suggest you scan the enclosed series of six articles by Bulkley Griffin of the Griffin- Larrabee News Bureau here. In the last of his articles, published last January, Mr. Griff:t.n says, "A main conclusion can be briefly stated. It is that the Air Force is misleading the public by its continuing campaign to produce and maintain belief that all sightings can be explained away as misidentification of familiar objects, such as balloons, stars, a~d aircraft." I have just today received a number of telegrams investigation of UFO's. One is from retired Air Ardmore, Tennessee, who says, "I have seen UFO. testify." urging a congressional Force Col. Harold R. Brown, Will be available to Another, from Mrs. Ethyle M. Davis, Eugene, Oregon, reads, "Nine out of ten people want truth of UFO's Press your investigation to the fullest." (MOB.E)
Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 15 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.