Documents / FOIA release

FBI file: UFO, UFO Part 16

Federal Bureau of Investigation · 169 pages · text by OCR

This Federal Bureau of Investigation file section collects 1949 Army intelligence reports of unidentified aerial objects seen around Camp Hood, Texas, forwarded by the San Antonio office, which told the Director it was reviewing and destroying such reports unless they held FBI interest. It also has 1957 FBI liaison memoranda on a radar-tracked object near Montauk Point and Benton, Pennsylvania, judged unlikely to be a Soviet operation. The file also includes a civilian Flying Saucer Researchers release arguing that saucers probably come from Mars.

  • p. 13 …The Watch Committee was told that the Air Defense Command has not completed its investigation of…
  • p. 39 …Department of the Air Force, Headquarters, Air Force Office of Special Investigations advised that the attached…
  • p. 40 …On 2/6/49 PAUL RYAN, Office of Special Investigations, Roswell, New Mexico, advise the resident…
  • p. 41 …Paul Ryan, Office of Special Investigation, Roswell, New Mexico, that two men whom he interviewed at…
  • p. 91 …to the Department of the Air Force, Headquarters Air Force Office of Special Investments $ \mathrm{H…
  • p. 114 …86 162 - 1987 Date September 27,1961 Office of Special Investigations Air Force Attention: Chief, Counterintelligence…
  • p. 117 …Office of Special Investigations Air Force Attention Chief, Counterintelligence Division From: John Edgar Hgover, Director Subject…
  • p. 118 Office of Special Investigations Air Force ## NOTE CONTINUED: letter to the Bureau attesting to the anticommunist…
  • p. 136 …March 20, 1954 ## Tot Director of Special Investigations The Inspector General Department of the Air Force…
## Pint

#41 Codv, Wyoming: A confusing report. The object resembled no known bird or moth or aircraft, but does resemble the coming Delta wing airplane shape, with a rocketship-like tube body. Its lack of motion noise is typical of saucer reports. It is also doubtful the newspaper would or could fake the photo, and naturally would need the negative to check it, and make prints. On the other hand, the entire top of the photo appears different than the bottom, being somewhat grainy, and the object has a sort of white edging as is noticed in superimposition photography. I am inclined to accept report on base the newspaper would not fake it. Vill try to get more on this report

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the fbi-vault collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. The text was read from the page images by an OCR model; expect the odd misread word. 169 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.