Documents / FOIA release

FBI file: UFO, UFO Part 12

Federal Bureau of Investigation · 142 pages · text by GLM-OCR

This FBI file section contains a 20 January 1953 letter from the Johnson County, Indiana civil defense office asking J. Edgar Hoover whether the International Flying Saucer Bureau was subversive, with an enclosed issue of its bulletin Space Review. It also holds 1956 FBI memoranda and letters to Air Force investigators on a Van Nuys landing claim, a bright light seen from Oxford, Pennsylvania, and a low spinning object seen near Henderson, North Carolina. In each case the FBI took no action.

  • p. 22 …He was advised that his offer of cooperation was appreciated, but that it was not desired…
  • p. 61 …matter, and would appreciate the Bureau's cooperation in immediately advising of details received concerning such…
  • p. 84 …Thanking you very much for your cooperation and consideration in this matter and will you please…
  • p. 104 …for a number of years and has cooperated with the United States Air Force to the…

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

# Office Memorandum . UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

FROM

SUBJECT:

DATE: August 29, 1952

UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECT ALLEGEDLY CITED BY MR. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA

By letter of August 26, 1952, the Air Force requested that we examine the cap of Mr. a scoutmaster at West Palm Beach, Florida, who claims that he observed an unidentified flying object in a desolate area. He reported that upon his investigation, a object 30 feet in diameter hovered over his head and shot a "red blob" which caused him to lose consciousness. The cap has some holes burned in it and it is reported that the hair on Desvergers' arms was singed. The Air Force requested that we determine, if possible, from any residues left the nature of the residual material.

The Air Force desires an oral report on this tonight. We have finished the examination and are preparing to advise the Air Force as follows:

1. There is no residue which would permit a determination as to the nature of the material which caused the burns in the cap. In addition to the obvious burns, there is one minute burned area which is probably too small to have been caused intentionally but more likely by a small hot ember.

3. When the cap is observed from the front, the left edge of the insignia and the fold in the blue cloth, there is an absence of singeing noted under the fold suggesting the possibility that the cap was not being worn when the singeing took place. It is noted that this fold "smooths out" when the cap is placed on the head.

2. The bill and a large part of the edges of the cap are singed but the singeing is not uniform as would be expected if it had been caused at one time by a single flash of flame. The front edge of the cap bill is more severely singed than other portions of the cap. This condition would not be expected if the source of the flame was directly overhead.

RECOMMENDATION: That in response to the request, of Colonel of the Air Force, it is recommended that he be orally advised of the above.

DJP/mek

221·03X30N1

RECORDED·122

162.83874-315

SEP 11 1952

2. SEP 1977

Cases discussed

About this file

FOIA release, from the fbi-vault collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. The text was read from the page images by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word. 142 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.