FBI file on United Nuclear, release 1

Read from the scan by GLM-OCR; expect the odd misread word.

# CART PEER REVIEW OF CASE FILE

Examiner Name:___ ___Examiner Symbols: NIA

Case ID:___. Division: AQ Lab #: NIA

Report Date:___ Peer Review Date:___

Peer Review Completed By: Reviewer Symbols: 11A

Was the exam cancelled before completion and subsequently documented? Yes No $ ^{N} / \mathrm{A} $

Did the results of the exams fulfill the request? Yes No

If additional information was provided by the requestor was it documented in the notes of examination and/or in the communication log? Yes No $ ^{N} / A $

Were approved tools and techniques utilized for the requested exams? Yes No If not, was a deviation documented and authorized? Yes No

Do the examiner's notes document all evidence examined? Yes No

Based upon review of examiner notes, could this examination be reproduced by the reviewing examiner? Yes No

Was each process documented in the Final Report? Yes No

If a confirmation of identification was requested is it documented? Yes No $ ^{N} /_{A} $

Are all team members listed on record of examination? Yes No $ ^{N} /_{A} $

Is there a Chain of Custody? Yes No

Does the transfer document.day/month/year and hour: minutes am or pm? Yes No

Did the Laboratory generate a chain of custody? If so was the:

Are all strikeouts initialed on the Chain of Custody? Yes No $ ^{N} /_{A} $

Is all evidence returned to Evidence Control in the appropriate Division? Yes No

Is the DE content in the required format? See EXM13 Yes No

Are all DEs labeled and documented in the final report? Yes No