Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency is dated 23 March 2010. It was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program and surveys the history of attempts to use superconductors to manipulate gravity in the laboratory. It reviews theoretical work by Li and Torr, Podkletnov's disputed gravity shielding experiments, NASA replication attempts and Tajmar's results. It concludes that no repeatable effect has been verified and that research in this area remains fraught with experimental difficulty.
“Anderson”1 page
UNCLASSIFIED/ ;SF81il 8FFll!ltllt ~81!! SHLY was evacuated and back-filled with argon to prevent YBCO degradation by water vapor. When the static machine was operated, a light blue planar "discharge" was seen to pass from the superconductor array to the annulus. At this instant, a pencil standing upright on a table in an adjoining room and separated from the experiment by a thick concrete wall fell over. Around this time, Koczor had raised some NASA funding to commission the commercial fabrication of a 27-cm bi-layer disk conforming to Podkletnov and Levit's 1997 specifications. Podkletnov visited the Toronto laboratory for a second time to assess the experimental progress, in particular the fabrication of the special bi-layer sintered ceramic YBCO disks. Upon persistent questioning about the methods he used to power the various coils (without sustaining high-voltage arcs), keep them in phase at high frequencies, and maintain stability during rotation, it was learned that Podkletnov was not involved in the electrical design but only in the ceramic side of the experiment. Nevertheless, he claimed that with our apparatus and "home-made" disks, one should see the shielding effect, but at a somewhat smaller magnitude than his original results owing to our expected lower rotational speeds. For several years prior to 1999, Professor Harald Reiss had been working on tests of gravity's influence on high-temperature superconductors and vice versa as a researcher at Asea Brown Boveri and later the University of Wuerzburg in Germany, where he taught courses in superconductivity. In that year he published (Reference 32) the results of precise measurements of the weights of superconducting and non- superconducting samples cooled below Tc and found anomalies not easily explained away. He weighed small, disk-shaped samples held in a specially made capsule while dipping it into LN2 and found a slight (~0.5 percent) weight increase of a high- temperature superconductor for which he was not able to offer a prosaic explanation. We supplied some YBCO disks for his experiments. His analysis of possible artifacts is thorough and very useful to other researchers investigating this area. In 2003, he published (Reference 33) an update of his ongoing LN2 experiments with increased precision and artifact reduction. He was still observing weight changes during Tc transition to a repeatable degree not achieved elsewhere. 1999 saw the wind-up of the NASA small-diameter nonrotating disk experiments with no unequivocal results. As the budget for such experimentation had been exhausted by the costly fabrication of the 27-cm bi-layer disk, Koczor tried to interest others, including our laboratory, to take on the task of levitating and RF-spinning this monster disk at LHe temperatures; we respectfully declined. Around 2002, Kaczor gave up trying, as the experiment was deemed too difficult without considerable effort, and no spare disks were available in case the only YBCO disk that was made broke! Two years later, Podkletnov and his collaborator on theory, Modanese, published a paper on the web concerning an enhanced version of the gravity beam, or "Impulse Gravity" experiment (Reference 34). This was the first general publication of the high- voltage impulse force experiment. Enough technical description was available to allow an assessment of the validity of experimental setup. Unfortunately, many unresolved technical questions cast considerable doubt on whether the experiment actually had been undertaken. Neither Podkletnov nor Modanese provided by a shred of confirmatory evidence. However, the paper presented a general summary of the theoretical work by Modanese and included an extensive bibliography. 8 UNCLASSIFIED/ ,<EiOAt OEiEiIQI.Ctk WliEii &••LY
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 16 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.