Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Space Access Where We ve Been And Where We Could Go

Defense Intelligence Agency · 56 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and dated 8 March 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It gives a historical and technical review of how to reach space and return. It covers hypersonic gliders, air-breathing and rocket propulsion, thermodynamics and materials, and launch options. It argues that reliable, schedulable access to low Earth orbit is mainly a hardware and propulsion problem rather than a technology one.

  • p. 44 …Figure 42 shows nominal mach 15 and mach 10 turns initiated at Edwards Air Force base…
UNCLASSIFIED//F81il 8FFI1il.t.k Wfili &,.kY
As per the U.S. Air Force requirements
we were working with, these TAV were
piloted and therefore had retractable
crew stations that could provide forward
visibility when permitted by thermal
conditions. The launch system (see
Figure 36) was adopted from the U.S.
Air Force Thor IRBM launch system and
from observations when the author was
at Baikanour, Kazakhstan. The vehicles
were in dry horizontal storage and were
serviced and loaded horizontally. The
hanger/shelter was rolled back for
erection to vertical position and then
fueled. The launch sequence was
patterned after the Baikanour Soyuz
launch, which is 12 hours. The Thor
IRBM launch sequence (LOX/RP-1) was
Figure 36. Simple Horizontal Integration and
Vertical Launch Provides Rapid Launch Capability
15 to 18 minutes. As in Baikanour, the payloads are not to be loaded into the vehicle
and then remain there for weeks before checking out. What is loaded into the vehicle
are checked-out payloads that need only to be attached to the carrying hardware. At
Baikanour there were about seven pre-checked out Soyuz and Progress payloads in
plastic wrap inerted with argon. The goal was to be able to launch a Soyuz launcher
within 7 to 12 hours in the event of an orbital emergency. The Soyuz launchers were in
dry storage and brought in on a railcar.
With the Russian fully automatic
checkout and fueling approach, this
would certainly be possible. Figure 37
shows an artist's illustration of a TAV
launch and recovery operational base.
The boosters are a concept from Joe
Thurgau of MDC Huntington Beach
"Toss-Back" boosters that, after
separation, rotate 180 degrees and fire
their rocket motors to "toss back" to the
launch site. An infrared guidance
system steers the booster to a recover
lake for a powered vertical landing
(upper righthand portion of the
illustration). The booster rocket engines
are nongimbaled, sealed with the heat
shield base. Either the 1-½ stage or the
2-stage systems could be launched. It
would have even been possible to launch
Figure 37. A Vertical Launch Complex Provides
Vertical Toss Back Booster Recovery and Horizontal
Landing Facilities for the Hypersonic Gliders
a booster by itself to rapidly transport it to another launch site (lower center portion of
the illustration). Runways are provided for returning hypersonic gliders (upper center
portion of the illustration), as well as for service and supply aircraft. Housing,
maintenance facilities, and other buildings are on adjacent property. It certainly would
be possible to launch this system from Vandenberg Air Force Base or Cape Canaveral,
34
UNCLASSIFIED/ ,<EiOA: QFFI@Itllt ~:!E! enc I

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 56 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.