Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Space Access Where We ve Been And Where We Could Go

Defense Intelligence Agency · 56 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and dated 8 March 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It gives a historical and technical review of how to reach space and return. It covers hypersonic gliders, air-breathing and rocket propulsion, thermodynamics and materials, and launch options. It argues that reliable, schedulable access to low Earth orbit is mainly a hardware and propulsion problem rather than a technology one.

  • p. 2 …FY 2009 Advanced Aerospace uestions pertaining to AAWSA Program Bldg 6000, Washington, under the Defense Intelligence…
  • p. 5 …Among the many advances in space access that will be possible in the future,' the key…
  • p. 10 UNCLASSIFIED/,Sf81il 8ffll!ltllt ~!II!! SHLY McDonnell Aircraft Advanced Design Dept. 1958 to 1967 Mr. H…
  • p. 11 …Louis) Advanced Design organization. The vehicle concept initially conceived in the late 1950s and early 1960s…
  • p. 23 …The photo in Figure 16 is from a Society of Automotive Engineers book titled Advanced Engine…
  • p. 30 …to advance beyond a demonstration tube ended in frustration. Any attempt to open the tube results…
  • p. 32 …Propulsion The photo in Figure 27 is from the Society of Automotive Engineers book, Advanced Engine…
  • p. 38 …These solution areas represent the entire propulsion spectrum, from all-rocket (far right) to advanced air…
  • p. 39 …the launcher can return with payload and fuel residuals onboard), use legacy correlations from McDonnell Advanced…
  • p. 45 …why have we advanced so little (as illustrated in Figure 43)? Like the pioneers' Conestoga wagons…
  • p. 47 …to advance beyond a solitary orbital station with limited capabilities. Figure 44 identifies the elements necessary…
  • p. 56 …6 KOchemann, D., "The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft - A Detailed Introduction to the Current Aerodynamic Knowledge…
UNCLASSIFIED/;«F&A 8FFHil.l1k 'JE'lii 811L>C
Adding the switchblade wing (see inset photo in Figure 10) provides a reasonable
takeoff speed for all mass ratios (green triangles). This takeoff speed with the
switchblade wing deployed is approximately the landing speed with the wing stowed.
With the wing deployed (blue diamonds), the landing speed is almost constant, since all
of the launcher vehicles have very similar empty-plus-payload weights (operational
weight empty). Then the landing speed becomes very modest, lower even than that of
most commercial transports and military aircraft. With this approach, the switchblade
wing can be either deployed or stowed, and the landing and takeoff speeds can be
essentially equal, adding a degree of operational simplicity. The switchblade wing was
designed with the expectation that the gliders would return with greater payloads than
they delivered. Landing and takeoff speeds correspond to those of current military
aircraft and commercial transports, at least for the lower mass ratios (5 or less).
Whether the switchblade wing is deployed or stowed, a set of solutions exists in which
the landing and takeoff speeds are similar.
Figure 34 begins with a solution map of vertical takeoff launchers, as represented by
the shaded areas in the lower part of the figure. All of these data are for converged
solutions, whereby the mission requirements are met and the mass and volume of each
solution are converged. These solution areas represent the entire propulsion spectrum,
from all-rocket (far right) to advanced air-breathing systems (far left). These solution
areas are for vertical takeoff and horizontal landing (VTOHL), with a thrust-to-weight
ratio at takeoff (TWTO) of 1.35 and a KOchemann tau equal to 0.2.
-
Q)
s<I)
<I)
0~
(')
1500
1000
500
0
2.0
T = 0.063 payload= 7 tons
976.3
WING LOADING
(kgim 2) 610.2
5613 \ \ 732.D
TWTO =1.35
T = 0.200463.7
~ I Q □
6'
3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
WR Weight Ratio to Orbital
Figure 34. Horizontal Launch Not Practical Unless Weight Ratio is Less Than Four
31
UNCLASSIFIED/ ,«F8A 8FFHiiI.«1k W&li &••LY

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 56 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.