Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and dated 8 March 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It gives a historical and technical review of how to reach space and return. It covers hypersonic gliders, air-breathing and rocket propulsion, thermodynamics and materials, and launch options. It argues that reliable, schedulable access to low Earth orbit is mainly a hardware and propulsion problem rather than a technology one.
“The Advance”12 pages
UNCLASSIFIED/;'f81il 8ffllltlit ~81!! 8HLV
Up-and-Down Operations
For an aircraft, the takeoff mode is not an issue: it is a runway takeoff and runway
landing. However, for a space launcher, the issue is not so clear-cut. With mass ratios
for launchers much greater than for aircraft (4 to 8, compared with less than 2 for
aircraft), runway speed is impractical for some launchers with high mass ratios. The
principal option is vertical takeoff, with horizontal landing remaining viable. The
problem is that in some launcher studies, the study directives mandated horizontal
takeoff regardless of the mass ratio. Many launcher studies have been thwarted by this
a priori dictate of horizontal takeoff. Air-breathing propulsion is then stuck with a "too
heavy" label because of the dictated takeoff mode. In reality, horizontal or vertical
takeoff, like the configuration concept, is less a choice than a result of the propulsion
concept selected. Horizontal takeoff requires that the wing loading be compatible with
the lift coefficient the configuration can generate and the maximum takeoff speed limit.
Figure 33 shows results for highly swept delta planforms, such as that of the Model 176
and FDL-7. Takeoff speeds for blended bodies in the 200- to 230-knot ranges were
postulated in the 1960s by using very large gimbaled rocket motors to rotate upward
and cause the body to also rotate, lifting off the nose wheel as the vehicle lifts off with
a thrust-supported takeoff. This concept was not known to have been implemented in
an actual system. For space launchers, the takeoff speed of the basic delta is high
(square symbols). If the takeoff speed is too high for the propulsion system chosen
(because of the weight ratio), then the only way to decrease the takeoff speed is to
increase the planform area for the system volume-that is, to reduce the K0chemann
tau. This, unfortunately, introduces a cascade of incremental mass increases that
result in an exponential rise of the takeoff gross weight (as shown in Figure 34). The
only lift-increasing devices available are a leading-edge vortex flap or a retractable
canard near the nose of the vehicle.
500
450 - :7 LJ
400
"' 3500
C
~
- ~5 [] 7
- L-~ r
__ ,
c ::J,-
300
TI
©
© 250u
C)
"" 2000
m
~ 150
e"
l I-, l_f
- ,- ) ,·,
['
;''~i{.., 'Ll c
' Ll
\ ~ L - FDL-7, TO
' ,' ' ,'\' :1;,_ t:: +SBVV. TO,,__., i.l
Ll ·-Ll ◊ + SVVB, LND
100 ◊ (70◊'-' vv () V ◊V ) ◊ V V
50
0
2 00 3 00 4 00 5.00 6 00 7 00 8 00 9 00
Weight Ratio to Orbital Speed
Figure 33. Takeoff and Landing Speeds of Minimum-Sized Launchers
30
UNCLASSIFIED/1«f81il 8FFI&I.«1k WliEii SU.kif Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 56 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.