Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Space Access Where We ve Been And Where We Could Go

Defense Intelligence Agency · 56 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and dated 8 March 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It gives a historical and technical review of how to reach space and return. It covers hypersonic gliders, air-breathing and rocket propulsion, thermodynamics and materials, and launch options. It argues that reliable, schedulable access to low Earth orbit is mainly a hardware and propulsion problem rather than a technology one.

UNCLASSIFIED//FIHl 8FFHil.t.k Wfili IH.k\f
On other McDonnell hypersonic configurations with all-movable control surfaces, the
interface between the fin and the body became a critical heating issue for the rotating
shaft attaching the fin to the body. This was an area of concern on this vehicle, and
specially instrumented fins were installed to measure the local heating. Again, the
thermographic phosphors were used to map the heating. Figure 20 shows the model in
Figure 17 at a maximum 48-degree angle of attack. Fin heating distributions were
made at 16-, 24-, 34-, and 48-degree angles of attack 12 and are shown in Figure 21.
The brighter the phosphor is, the lower its temperature is (the phosphor darkens as the
surface temperature increases). So the area adjacent to the body is at a lower
temperature than on the fin. In fact, examining Figure 21 shows that for all angles of
attack tested, there was always the cool layer adjacent to the body. So the fin
attachment journal/shaft would not be a thermal problem. At angles of attack lower
than 16 degrees, the heating became less intense. This tail configuration of a fixed
anhedral lower fin with trailing edge controls and an all-movable upper fin provided the
control authority over the entire mach range required for stability and control and did
not have a thermodynamic issue with fin attachment heating.
II = 48°
Figure 20. Thermographic Phosphor Image of
Model 176 at Near-Maximum Angle of Attack
<'\
-- ·-----:.:____~~\
FIG. 6. ISODENSITRACER map, for lifting bady tail fin fa, fou:r
angles al attack; canlaurs shaw q,.ocAL/qu~nu~.,Cli:
Figure 21. From L/D Maximum to Maximum Angle
of Attack, There is Always a Cool Sublayer
Adjacent to the Wall
With 1960 materials and manufacturing methods, about 95 percent of the aerodynamic
heating was radiated to space, about 2. 5 percent was retained in the shingles, and
about 2.5 percent was transferred into the titanium tank/primary structure. Using
Goodrich Aerospace's standoff/attachment techniques developed for the X-33, today
around 0.5 to 1 percent of the aerodynamic heating would be transferred into the
titanium tank/primary structure. The shingle material would also be better today.
Figure 22 shows a silicon carbide matrix reinforced with silicon carbide fibers that was
shown at the 1988 Paris Air Show. A combustor of this material was operated at 3,000
° F continuously for a number of days at SEP's Bordeaux plant, as witnessed by the
author. Unfortunately, SEP was subsequently taken over by another company and
promptly closed. The parts manufacturing at Bordeaux was truly impressive to
someone in space systems but too costly to a subsonic round engine manufacturer.
20
UNCLASSIFIED/;SflUl 8FFl&I.«1k WliEii IU.klf

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 56 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.