Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Space Access Where We ve Been And Where We Could Go

Defense Intelligence Agency · 56 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and dated 8 March 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It gives a historical and technical review of how to reach space and return. It covers hypersonic gliders, air-breathing and rocket propulsion, thermodynamics and materials, and launch options. It argues that reliable, schedulable access to low Earth orbit is mainly a hardware and propulsion problem rather than a technology one.

  • p. 5 …much the issue, as exemplified by the Lockheed A-12/SR-71. When asked about space…
  • p. 12 …the AFFDL at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, the McDonnell Douglas Corporation (MDC), and the Lockheed…
  • p. 20 …This was similar to the Lockheed Star Clipper (see Figure 38). liE!l B:!lll IElill…
  • p. 42 …So both Lockheed Aircraft and McDonnell Douglas proposed a self-sustained operational system using recoverable lateral…
  • p. 51 …and logistics requirements, Lockheed, NAS-9-1422. • Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL), Lockheed, NAS-9-1688. • Manned…
UNCLASSIFIED//FIHl 8FFHil.t.k Wfili IH.k\f
transpiration cooled with a low-rate water-porous spherical nose. The sharp leading
edges (the same leading edge radius was used for the nose tip) were liquid-metal heat
pipes. This approach was tested successfully during the 1964-68 timeframe and was
found to be equal in weight and far more durable than a comparable ceramic
tile/carbon-carbon system. The AFFDL's experience with carbon-carbon leading edges
on the ASSET test vehicle convinced the Air Force it needed a more durable solution.
Figure 12 compares the FDL-7C/D and the McDonnell Douglas Model 176. The Model
176 had a power law nose that was essentially a curved spatular nose and a higher
sweep angle, resulting in the same usable volume but with a higher hypersonic L/D.
Sacrificed were the flat-panel thermal-protection shingles over part of the fore body.
Both configurations retained the X-tail configuration developed by Gil Gaumer of
McDonnell Douglas. At the time, the launch vehicle would have been a Martin Titan
IIIC. Had an engine with the performance of the Pratt & Whitney XLR-129 been
available, there would have been lateral recoverable, fuel/oxidizer tanks on either side
of the vehicle, with all of the engines installed in the hypersonic glider. This was similar
to the Lockheed Star Clipper (see Figure 38).
liE!l B:!lll IElill
5 meters
Model 176
Modified
✓/
I
- -
I
"
circa 1962
1-H &\ii\i l&ffi
5 meters
/
', FDL-7 C/D
Modified
circa 1964
Figure 12. Comparison of FDL-7C/D (top) and Model 176 (bottom)
13
UNCLASSIFIED//FQII. QFFlliil,t k llili &•lk¥

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 56 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.