Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Space Access Where We ve Been And Where We Could Go

Defense Intelligence Agency · 56 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document, prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and dated 8 March 2010, was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It gives a historical and technical review of how to reach space and return. It covers hypersonic gliders, air-breathing and rocket propulsion, thermodynamics and materials, and launch options. It argues that reliable, schedulable access to low Earth orbit is mainly a hardware and propulsion problem rather than a technology one.

  • p. 2 …FY 2009 Advanced Aerospace uestions pertaining to AAWSA Program Bldg 6000, Washington, under the Defense Intelligence…
  • p. 5 …Among the many advances in space access that will be possible in the future,' the key…
  • p. 10 UNCLASSIFIED/,Sf81il 8ffll!ltllt ~!II!! SHLY McDonnell Aircraft Advanced Design Dept. 1958 to 1967 Mr. H…
  • p. 11 …Louis) Advanced Design organization. The vehicle concept initially conceived in the late 1950s and early 1960s…
  • p. 23 …The photo in Figure 16 is from a Society of Automotive Engineers book titled Advanced Engine…
  • p. 30 …to advance beyond a demonstration tube ended in frustration. Any attempt to open the tube results…
  • p. 32 …Propulsion The photo in Figure 27 is from the Society of Automotive Engineers book, Advanced Engine…
  • p. 38 …These solution areas represent the entire propulsion spectrum, from all-rocket (far right) to advanced air…
  • p. 39 …the launcher can return with payload and fuel residuals onboard), use legacy correlations from McDonnell Advanced…
  • p. 45 …why have we advanced so little (as illustrated in Figure 43)? Like the pioneers' Conestoga wagons…
  • p. 47 …to advance beyond a solitary orbital station with limited capabilities. Figure 44 identifies the elements necessary…
  • p. 56 …6 KOchemann, D., "The Aerodynamic Design of Aircraft - A Detailed Introduction to the Current Aerodynamic Knowledge…
UNCLASSIFIED/ «F&A 8FFI~ICP 1!55 0111 YI
designed, weighed, and performed using the same industrial fabrication capability. The
result was a curve representing each configuration family, as shown in Figure 7. The
three families are represented by the three parallel straight lines.
I
SV FAMILY
1 5 - <u; ;;P
~ '- ~ / ·,I
/ ',
- . \ I
. \ ,_
., ' I
- \ \ ~ •\_
-
1 0 --- '
--- ---- '
--- '- - . '
'
w =-- - - - - - --- .... ~' ·,
• B,t!l1:.::t1c HJL ~AMILY '-
- ~
- .cs::::n:r ' '
W =WO• 1+--
( L/DJ
11 1
MRSfAMIIY
I I I I I I I I I ' ' ' '
0 3
Hypersonic LID
Figure 7. Detailed Design Analyses Show the Weight Trends are as Much a Function of Configuration
Family as Lift-to-Drag Ratio
W/W" = K{I +0.090lg_L/D)]
K = 1.000 for the SY Family
K = 0.9297 lorthe FDL Family
K = 0. 7622 for the MRS Family
~
( 3)
This illustrates that the configuration and its individual wetted area to planform area
can vary as much in their spacecraft weight as they can in their L/D ratio. The high
L/D-ratio configurations had weights comparable to same-payload ballistic capsules of:
sv = 1.9 FDL= 1.7 MRS =1.4
So the penalty for having a lifting-body configuration is less than expected if the
configuration characteristics are taken into consideration in the design and weighing of
the spacecraft. In addition, the reason the lifting spacecraft with high performance was
considered was to eliminate the need for sea recovery and therefore the cost of a
recovery fleet and the damage incurred by the spacecraft in a saltwater landing. The
9
UNCLASSIFIED/ ;«F8A 8FFI&I.«1k WliS SUlklf

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 56 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.