Documents / Report

Defense Intelligence Reference Document Quantum Tomography Of Negative Energy States In The Vacuum

Defense Intelligence Agency · 51 pages · text from the file's own layer

This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency is dated 11 January 2011. It was produced in FY 2010 under the Advanced Aerospace Weapons System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It reviews negative, or sub-vacuum, energy found in squeezed light and the Casimir effect, and explains quantum optical homodyne tomography as a way to measure and map that energy in the lab. It proposes balanced homodyne detector arrays that could help detect anomalous aerospace platforms using engineered spacetime propulsion.

  • p. 41 …r J+x •• ( • r • r ) Pex,(g,x)= -wdrdsg(r)g(s)G'l(r-s…
UNCLASSIFIEDf ;reR: 9PPll!ltlit '1181! tH•tY
~ . ~ r
H,i,r_, 111 =ex' ®E;(x,t) • g(t)where e is the electron charge and g(t) is a smooth test
(or smearing) function that is equal to 1 during the measurement and smoothly
vanishing elsewhere. Using first-order time-dependent perturbation theory, Marecki [5,
6] derived the probability of excitation:
r J+x •• ( • r • r )
Pex,(g,x)= -wdrdsg(r)g(s)G'l(r-s) E;(x,r)E/x,s) s' (14)
where Gii(r-s)= fdq(Olx;(r)l&)(&lx\s)IO) is the electronic two-point function, rand
s are dummy time and integration variables, and fdrdsg(r)g(s) is the temporal
sensitivity in the measurement process.
The balanced homodyne detector consists of an arrangement of two photodiodes,
whose outputs are subtracted, and illuminated with an auxiliary coherent state of the
radiation field (i.e., the local oscillator, LO; see Figure 15). Per the discussion in
Section IIIB-4, the LO is used as a tool to investigate the properties of a certain state S
of the quantum radiation field under study, and so on a BHD the state Sis optically
mixed with the coherent LO state (see References [SJ or [6] for further details). The
quantum field S de-balances the detector (stochastic process of measurement). The
expectation value of the observable corresponding to the electronic charge collected at
the point Pin Figure 15 (i.e., the BHD current) is the difference of excitation
' 'probabilities of the two photodiodes [S, 6]: ( J \- = P,,x.:CK, x) - P,,xc (g, y), where positions
X and } correspond to the positions :! and y in Figure 15. Further calculations and
other theoretical considerations lead to the following final result for (.!)_1
. [5, 6]:
(1) 5 =a,,,• £~0 • ( £, (f,1 11 ) + £J}·,t0 ) )s where ae, depends on the electronic structure
of the PIN semiconductor in the photodiode, E/.o is the electric field of the LO
(corresponding to Fin Figure 15), to is the LO phase that can easily be varied in
. r
experiments, and all field operators E 1(x,t) are restricted to the frequency ffi of the LO.
37
UNCLASSIFIED//FAR AFFIQI.«1k '1181!! 8HL I

Not linked to a story yet.

About this file

Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 51 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.