Documents / Report
This Defense Intelligence Reference Document from the Defense Intelligence Agency, dated 28 January 2010, surveys pulsed high-power microwave (HPM) source technology. It was produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) program. It covers insulation, cathode materials, high-voltage switching, pulse generators, microwave sources such as magnetrons, gyrotrons and the Phoenix and Jolt sources, and antennas. The document concludes that progress depends on advances in cathodes, switching and insulation. It says compact ultrawideband antennas will remain difficult to build.
UNCLASSIFIED/ 'FOR OFFICIO I 1!55 0111 Y • breakdown. One solution to these difficulties has been transformer-coupling the load by having the FCG drive the primary of a transformer. The load for HPM production is typically some type of loop antenna with very small inductance and driven directly from the generator. Much research has been done on the effectiveness of this type of antenna, and one method of improving the operation is to fuse the loop along its length such that at peak current, the fuses open and radiate large voltage dI/dt spikes. Pulsed High-Power Microwave Sources Pulsed HPM sources can be divided into two types: • Pulsed electron beam sources - these are typically narrow-band HPM sources such as relativistic klystron amplifiers, backward wave oscillators, traveling wave tubes, split-cavity oscillators, reltron and super reltron, virtual cathode oscillators, magnetrons, gyrotrons, and the magnetically insulated line oscillator. • Impulse HPM sources - these are typically wideband or ultrawideband sources such as SNIPER, EMBL, Phoenix, Jolt, Thor, GEM II, and the H series. PULSED ELECTRON BEAM SOURCES In pulsed electron beam sources, the RF source includes an electron beam generator, a beam transport, and a wave structure. These sources work by converting the kinetic energy of an electron beam into EM energy. BWOs, TWTs, AND RKAs HPM tubes, such as backward wave oscillators (BWOs), traveling wave tubes (TWTs), and relativistic klystron amplifiers (RKAs), are also very similar in concept to their conventional counterparts. The main differences lie in the techniques of beam formation; the use of pulsed, large magnitude axial magnetic fields for beam transport; and the application of relativistic voltages and very high beam currents. BWO efficiencies as high as 35 percent have been obtained at moderate power levels, but as power levels are increased, the output levels tend to saturate, and the radiated spectra tends to broaden. These effects are due to beam breakup and turbulent transport. To maintain high beam quality, large magnetic fields are required for high-power operation. An approximately 25- to 50-kG applied axial field implies that mechanically strong solenoidal magnets are required with pulsed capacitor banks to drive them. These requirements in turn dictate a much larger and heavier HPM source. TWTs can be made using many of the same techniques as BWOs. The difference is that the beam- wave interaction is with a forward wave. Thus, TWTs have many of the same issues and limitations as BWO sources. RKAs use cavities for beam bunching and power extraction rather than continuous slow wave structures as in BWOs and TWTs. Some RKA designs use extended structures for power extraction to reduce the power densities and to increase efficiency. They use high beam currents where space charge forces become dominant in the bunching process. Tubes have been developed at the 10-GW power level. They use 0.5 to 1 MeV beams guided by axial magnetic fields of about 10 kG. Efficiencies are on the order of 40-50 percent. Some of the issues with these tubes are beam transport, beam loading of the cavities, base pressure of the vacuum system, x- 17 UNCLASSIFIED//5O9 AFFJCJOP 1!55 2111 Y
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 37 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.