Documents / Report
The Defense Intelligence Agency issued this Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIA-08-0911-012), dated 14 December 2009, as one of its FY 2009 advanced technology reports under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. It reviews how metallic glasses are structured and processed, their mechanical properties, and metallic glass matrix composites. It concludes that dendritic composites could replace high-strength steels in some aerospace parts. It adds that wide aerospace use depends critically on developing new lightweight glass-forming alloys.
UNCLASSIFIED/;CFSHI GFFHilf L Ulili Glib¥ EX SITU COMPOSITES There are two basic ways of making ex situ composites, in which the metallic glass matrix and the crystalline phase are combined physically, without a chemical reaction: • Add crystalline particles to a melt of a glass-forming alloy and then cast under conditions that allow the matrix to form a metallic glass. • Make a preform of a crystalline phase (by packing fibers into a mold, for instance) and then cast the glass-forming alloy around the preform. Both approaches have limitations. In the first, the addition of particles to the melt increases the viscosity (which is already quite high relative to non-glass-forming alloys) considerably, ultimately to a point where casting becomes impossible. This limits the volume fraction of particles that can be added, which in turn limits the control one has over the microstructure and, in particular, the spacing of the particles. With a perform, the volume fraction of the crystalline phase can be much higher (up to about 80 percent by volume), but the problem then is how to infiltrate the high-viscosity melt into the preform without leaving voids and while still ensuring sufficiently rapid cooling to form a glassy matrix. With both approaches, interfacial reactions between the crystalline phase and the melt can cause partial or complete crystallization of the matrix, degrading the mechanical properties. IN SITU COMPOSITES The difficulty of making satisfactory ex situ composites has led to the development of a new approach in which the crystalline phase is precipitated directly from the melt, either during casting 28 or in a separate step prior to casting. 29 30 Precipitation during casting, although easier, is problematic from a practical standpoint because variations in the cooling rate (from the surface to the center of a castingr for instance) lead to significant variations in structure and, hence, in properties. One of the most promising recent advances in the metallic glass field is the development of in situ composites in which the crystalline phase is precipitated as dendrites, either during casting (Figure 8) or by holding the alloy at an elevated temperature prior to casting. 31 By suitably choosing alloy composition, holding time, and temperature, the volume fraction, size, and spacing of the dendritic phase can be controlled. This control provides great flexibility in determining the mechanical properties of the resulting material. Because the crystalline phase is produced prior to casting, variation in the cooling rate across the casting is much less important, though the cooling rate must still be sufficiently high to ensure the matrix forms a glass during cooling. Once the glassy matrix is formed, the composite can be reheated above the glass transition temperature, allowing for thermoplastic forming in a manner similar to single-phase metallic glasses (as described above). Finally, the presence of the dendritic second phase allows for deformation processes (for example, by cold rolling or forging), similar to crystalline alloys. 32 14 UNCLASSIFIED/t1Pllrt llPPl@IJltL ~9£! 9Ht I
Not linked to a story yet.
Report, from the dia collection. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 30 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.